Health worker experiences of implementing TB infection prevention and control: A qualitative evidence synthesis to inform implementation recommendations

Author:

van der Westhuizen Helene-MariORCID,Dorward JienchiORCID,Roberts NiaORCID,Greenhalgh TrishaORCID,Ehrlich RodneyORCID,Butler Chris C.ORCID,Tonkin-Crine SarahORCID

Abstract

Implementation of TB infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in health facilities is frequently inadequate, despite nosocomial TB transmission to patients and health workers causing harm. We aimed to review qualitative evidence of the complexity associated with implementing TB IPC, to help guide the development of TB IPC implementation plans. We undertook a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies that used qualitative methods to explore the experiences of health workers implementing TB IPC in health facilities. We searched eight databases in November 2021, complemented by citation tracking. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts and reviewed full texts of potentially eligible papers. We used the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme checklist for quality appraisal, thematic synthesis to identify key findings and the GRADE-CERQual method to appraise the certainty of review findings. The review protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO, ID CRD42020165314. We screened 1062 titles and abstracts and reviewed 102 full texts, with 37 studies included in the synthesis. We developed 10 key findings, five of which we had high confidence in. We describe several components of TB IPC as a complex intervention. Health workers were influenced by their personal occupational TB risk perceptions when deciding whether to implement TB IPC and neglected the contribution of TB IPC to patient safety. Health workers and researchers expressed multiple uncertainties (for example the duration of infectiousness of people with TB), assumptions and misconceptions about what constitutes effective TB IPC, including focussing TB IPC on patients known with TB on treatment who pose a small risk of transmission. Instead, TB IPC resources should target high risk areas for transmission (crowded, poorly ventilated spaces). Furthermore, TB IPC implementation plans should support health workers to translate TB IPC guidelines to local contexts, including how to navigate unintended stigma caused by IPC, and using limited IPC resources effectively.

Funder

Rhodes Scholarships

Wellcome Trust

National Institute for Health Research

Economic and Social Research Council

Health Data Research UK

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference69 articles.

1. World Health Organization (WHO). 2020 Global Tuberculosis Report. 2020. [cited 2021 Dec 26] https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013131

2. Turning off the spigot: Reducing drug-resistant tuberculosis transmission in resource-limited settings;EA Nardell;Int J Tuberc Lung Dis,2010

3. Risk of Tuberculosis Infection and Disease for Health Care Workers: An Updated Meta-Analysis;L Uden;Open Forum Infect Dis,2017

4. Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis;C Houghton;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2020

5. Face coverings for covid-19: From medical intervention to social practice;H-M van der Westhuizen;BMJ,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3