Assessing health research grant applications: A retrospective comparative review of a one-stage versus a two-stage application assessment process-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessing health research grant applications: A retrospective comparative review of a one-stage versus a two-stage application assessment process

Published:2020-03-12 Issue:3 Volume:15 Page:e0230118
ISSN:1932-6203
Container-title:PLOS ONE
language:en
Short-container-title:PLoS ONE

Author:

Morgan Ben^ORCID,Yu Ly-Mee,Solomon Tom,Ziebland Sue

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference20 articles.

1. UK Health Research Analysis 2014 http://www.ukcrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/UKCRCHealthResearchAnalysis2014-WEB.pdf [Accessed 20 March 2019]

2. Spending on health: A global overview https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/spending-on-health-a-global-overview [Accessed 20 March 2019]

3. On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers;DL Herbert;BMJ Open,2013

4. Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System Exceeds the Cost of Giving Every Qualified Researcher a Baseline Grant;Richard Gordon;Accountability in Research,2009

5. Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study;A.G. Barnett;BMC Health Serv Res,2015

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Improving the efficiency of research proposals evaluation: A two-stage procedure;Research Evaluation;2024-05-15

2. Preparing a Grant Proposal for Medical Research in the UK;Grant writing for medical and healthcare professionals;2023

3. Getting funded in a highly fluctuating environment: Shifting from excellence to luck and timing;PLOS ONE;2022-11-07

4. Strategies to support early- and mid-career cardiovascular researchers to thrive;2022-02-08

5. The modified lottery: Formalizing the intrinsic randomness of research funding;Accountability in Research;2021-05-18