Abstract
Correlation does not imply causation, but this does not necessarily stop people from drawing causal inferences from correlational statements. We show that people do in fact infer causality from statements of association, under minimal conditions. In Study 1, participants interpreted statements of the form “X is associated with Y” to imply that Y causes X. In Studies 2 and 3, participants interpreted statements of the form “X is associated with an increased risk of Y” to imply that X causes Y. Thus, even the most orthodox correlational language can give rise to causal inferences.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference7 articles.
1. Logic and Conversation
2. Using Language
3. Pragmatic language interpretation as probabilistic inference;ND Goodman;Trends in cognitive sciences,2016
4. Implicit causality in verbs;C Garvey;Linguistic Inquiry,1974
5. What are implicit causality and consequentiality?;MJ Pickering;Language and Cognitive Processes,2007
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献