How Interpretable Machine Learning Can Benefit Process Understanding in the Geosciences

Author:

Jiang Shijie12ORCID,Sweet Lily‐belle34ORCID,Blougouras Georgios125ORCID,Brenning Alexander25ORCID,Li Wantong1ORCID,Reichstein Markus12ORCID,Denzler Joachim26,Shangguan Wei7ORCID,Yu Guo8ORCID,Huang Feini127ORCID,Zscheischler Jakob349ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biogeochemical Integration Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Jena Germany

2. ELLIS Unit Jena Jena Germany

3. Department of Compound Environmental Risks Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ Leipzig Germany

4. Faculty of Environmental Sciences Technische Universität Dresden Dresden Germany

5. Department of Geography Friedrich Schiller University Jena Jena Germany

6. Computer Vision Group Friedrich Schiller University Jena Jena Germany

7. School of Atmospheric Sciences Sun Yat–Sen University Zhuhai China

8. Division of Hydrologic Sciences Desert Research Institute Las Vegas NV USA

9. Center for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (ScaDS.AI) Leipzig Germany

Abstract

AbstractInterpretable Machine Learning (IML) has rapidly advanced in recent years, offering new opportunities to improve our understanding of the complex Earth system. IML goes beyond conventional machine learning by not only making predictions but also seeking to elucidate the reasoning behind those predictions. The combination of predictive power and enhanced transparency makes IML a promising approach for uncovering relationships in data that may be overlooked by traditional analysis. Despite its potential, the broader implications for the field have yet to be fully appreciated. Meanwhile, the rapid proliferation of IML, still in its early stages, has been accompanied by instances of careless application. In response to these challenges, this paper focuses on how IML can effectively and appropriately aid geoscientists in advancing process understanding—areas that are often underexplored in more technical discussions of IML. Specifically, we identify pragmatic application scenarios for IML in typical geoscientific studies, such as quantifying relationships in specific contexts, generating hypotheses about potential mechanisms, and evaluating process‐based models. Moreover, we present a general and practical workflow for using IML to address specific research questions. In particular, we identify several critical and common pitfalls in the use of IML that can lead to misleading conclusions, and propose corresponding good practices. Our goal is to facilitate a broader, yet more careful and thoughtful integration of IML into Earth science research, positioning it as a valuable data science tool capable of enhancing our current understanding of the Earth system.

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3