Abstract
Background
In France, hospital units responsible for providing inpatient care have few opportunities to address the issue of task interruptions. In Australia, the Dual Perspectives Method (DMP) has been developed to assess interruptions. The method makes it possible to link teamwork and interruptions, by considering the work functions that constitute the system.
Objective
To develop a tool that can characterize interruptions from the point of view of work functions that is tailored to French hospital units providing inpatient care. The aim was to adapt the items recorded using the DPM and their response categories, and to study the acceptability of observing interruptions for participating teams.
Method
The items recorded in the DPM were translated and adapted taking into account the French definition of interruptions. This step identified 19 items that targeted the interrupted professional, and 16 that targeted the interrupting professional. The characteristics of interruptions were recorded in September 2019 among 23 volunteer teams in a region in western France. Two observers simultaneously observed the same professional. Observations lasted seven consecutive hours, and targeted all professional categories within the same team.
Results
The characteristics of 1,929 interruptions were noted. The observation period was well-received by teams. The following terminology regarding the work functions of the interrupting professional was clarified: “coordination of institutional resources”, in relation to “the establishment’s support processes”, “patient services”, and “the patient’s social life”. We believe that our categorization of response modes is exhaustive.
Conclusions
We have developed an observational tool, Team’IT, which is tailored to inpatient hospital care in France. Its implementation is the first step in a system to support teams in managing interruptions, and will enable them to reflect on their working methods, and whether interruptions can be avoided. Our work is part of an approach that seeks to improve and enhance the safety of professional practices, by contributing to the longstanding, complex debate about the flow and effectiveness of patient care.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03786874 (December 26, 2018).
Funder
Direction Générale de l’offre de Soins
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference39 articles.
1. Clinical Pathways as Instruments for Risk and Cost Management in Hospitals—A Discussion Paper;T Romeyke;Glob J Health Sci. 29 févr,2012
2. Coping with more people with more illness. Part 1: the nature of the challenge and the implications for safety and quality;R Amalberti;Int J Qual Health Care. 1 mars,2019
3. For the Sake of Justice: Should We Prioritize Rare Diseases?
4. Haute autorité de santé (HAS). La sécurité des patients. Mettre en oeuvre la gestion des risques associés aux soins en établissement de santé. Des concepts à la pratique. [Patient safety. Implementing risk management in health care facilities. From concepts to practice.] [Internet]. 2012. Disponible sur: https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2012-04/guide_gdr_pages1a64.pdf
5. Benefits, Barriers and Determinants of Clinical Pathway Use in Germany, Austria and Switzerland;E Noehammer;A pilot study. Health Serv Manage Res. 30 juin,2022
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献