Improving care safety by characterizing task interruptions during interactions between healthcare professionals: an observational study

Author:

Teigné Delphine12ORCID,Cazet Lucie1,Birgand Gabriel23,Moret Leila2,Maupetit Jean-Claude24,Mabileau Guillaume1ORCID,Terrien Noémie1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Structure Régionale d’Appui (SRA) QualiREL Santé, Hôpital Saint Jacques , 85 rue Saint-Jacques, Nantes Cedex 1 44093, France

2. Public Health Department, University Hospital of Nantes , 85 rue Saint-Jacques, Nantes Cedex 1 44093, France

3. Centre d’appui pour la Prévention des infections associées aux soins Pays de la Loire , CHU de Nantes, 5 rue Pr Boquien, Nantes cedex 1 44093, France

4. Observatoire du MEdicament, des DIspositifs Médicaux et de l’innovation thérapeutique Pays de la Loire, CHU de Nantes , 85 rue Saint-Jacques, Nantes cedex 1 44093, France

Abstract

Abstract Few studies have investigated interruptions to the work of professionals practicing in inpatient hospitals, and even fewer take account of the functions that make up the system. Safety of care can be improved by considering avoidable interruptions during interactions between managerial and care delivery functions. The present study describes the characteristics of interruptions to the work of professionals working in the inpatient hospital sector, with respect to their typology, frequency, duration, and avoidability in the context of interactions between functions. This direct observational study of interruptions in hospital care was performed in the Pays de la Loire (west coast) area of France. A total of 23 teams (17 institutions) working in medical or surgical specialties (excluding intensive care) were included. Observations were performed between May and September 2019, and lasted seven consecutive hours per team. A pair of observers simultaneously observed the same professional for ∼30 min. Each occupational category was examined. Reported characteristics were: (i) the method and duration of the request, (ii) the location of interrupted and interrupting persons, (iii) the reaction of the interrupted person, (iv) the characteristics of the interrupting person, and (v) the classification of interrupted and interrupting tasks according to their function. An avoidable interruption was defined. Interruptions during interactions between professionals were categorised in terms of their function and avoidability. Descriptive statistical analyses (mean, standard deviation, and distribution) were run. In particular, cross-comparisons were run to highlight avoidability interruptions and interactions between managerial and care delivery functions during the working day, for different professional categories, and for the location of the request. Overall, 286 interrupted professionals were observed and 1929 interruptions were characterised. The majority of interruptions were due to a face-to-face request (58.7%), lasting ≤30 s (72.5%). Professionals engaged in the response in 49.3% of cases. A total of 57.4% of interruptions were avoidable. The average number of interruptions was 10.5 (SD = 3.2) per hour per professional. An analysis of avoidability and interactions between managerial and care delivery functions found that the period between 12:00 and 13:00 was the riskiest in terms of care safety. This study highlighted the characteristics of interruptions to the activity of professionals working in inpatient hospitals. Care teams could focus on making medical and nursing professionals much more aware of the importance of interruptions, and each team could decide how to best-manage interruptions, in the context of their specific working environment.

Funder

Direction Générale de l'offre de Soins

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Traditions of research into interruptions in healthcare: a conceptual review;McCurdie;Int J Nurs Stud,2017

2. Interruptions in surgery: a comprehensive review;Bretonnier;J Surg Res,2020

3. Interruptions during general practice consultations—the patients’ view;Dearden;Fam Pract,1996

4. Interruptions to intensive care nurses and clinical errors and procedural failures: a controlled study of causal connection;Santomauro;J Patient Saf,2021

5. Effects of interruptions to nurses during medication administration: Janette Bennett and colleagues explain why interrupting nurses, particularly when they are administering drugs, can affect the quality of the care they provide;Bennett;Nurs Manag (Harrow),2010

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Interruptions de tâches et leurs conséquences;Le Praticien en Anesthésie Réanimation;2024-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3