The comparison of the performance of four whole genome amplification kits on ion proton platform in copy number variation detection

Author:

Zhang Xinyi1,Liang Bo23,Xu Xiaoyan1,Zhou Feifei1,Kong Lingyin4,Shen Jingjing4,Xia Yingying2,Xuan Liming4,Mao Yan2,Xue Yongfeng2,Liu Caixia56,Tan Jichun1

Affiliation:

1. Reproductive Medical Center of Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, China

2. Basecare Medical Device Co., Ltd., Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China

3. State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic and Developmental Sciences, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China.

4. Cyagen Health Inc., Suzhou, Jiangsu 215400, China

5. Key Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine of Liaoning Province, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, China.

6. Key Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Higher Education of Liaoning Province, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, China.

Abstract

With the development and clinical application of genomics, more and more concern is focused on single-cell sequencing. In the process of single-cell sequencing, whole genome amplification is a key step to enrich sample DNA. Previous studies have compared the performance of different whole genome amplification (WGA) strategies on Illumina sequencing platforms, but there is no related research aimed at Ion Proton platform, which is also a popular next-generation sequencing platform. Here by amplifying cells from six cell lines with different karyotypes, we estimated the data features of four common commercial WGA kits (PicoPLEX WGA Kit, GenomePlex Single Cell Whole Genome Amplification Kit, MALBAC Single Cell Whole Genome Amplification Kit, and REPLI-g Single Cell Kit), including median absolute pairwise difference, uniformity, reproducibility, and fidelity, and examined their performance of copy number variation detection. The results showed that both MALBAC and PicoPLEX could yield high-quality data and had high reproducibility and fidelity; and as for uniformity, PicoPLEX was slightly superior to MALBAC.

Publisher

Portland Press Ltd.

Subject

Cell Biology,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry,Biophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3