Abstract
Summary. Introduction: Today, the growing human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields is of serious concern to the population and the international scientific community. Sources of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in residential areas include mobile radio base stations, signal repeaters, wireless broadband access points, TV and radio transmitters, satellite earth stations, radar and radio relay stations. Launching of 5G mobile networks will further complicate the electromagnetic situation in inhabited areas, especially in megacities where the size of exposed population is the largest. In the system of measures contributing to protection of the population from adverse health effects of electromagnetic fields, standards (regulations and other documents establishing electromagnetic fields permissible levels) play a significant role and lay the foundation for organizational and technical measures of protection. High importance of standards in ensuring electromagnetic safety served as the basis for our study. The objective of the study was to perform a comparative analysis of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields standards for inhabited areas and approaches to setting electromagnetic fields exposure levels adopted by different countries and international organizations. Methods: We reviewed of some aspects of biological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, regulations setting electromagnetic fields exposure limits in different countries and recommended by ICNIRP, and approaches to establishing those limits. Conclusions: We found a significant discrepancy in radiofrequency electromagnetic fields limits adopted in different countries, the legal status and scope of regulatory documents. Differences in the methodology for the development, adoption and approval of electromagnetic fields standard accompanied by differences in their legal status prevent uniform EMF standard setting.
Publisher
Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology
Reference21 articles.
1. 1. Grigoriev YuG, Grigoriev OA. [Cellular communication and health: electromagnetic environment, radiobiological and hygienic problems, hazard forecast.] Moscow: Ekonomikа Publ., 2013. 573 p. (In Russian).
2. 2. Belpomme D, Hardell L, Belyaev I, et al. Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity nonionizing radiation: An international perspective. Environ Pollut. 2018; 242(Pt A):643-658. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.019
3. 3. Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, et al. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology. 2008; 19(4):523-529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e318175dd47
4. 4. Volkow ND, Tomasi D, Wang GF, et al. Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism. JAMA. 2011; 305(8):808-813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.186
5. 5. Agarwal A, Desai NR, Makker K, et al. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2009; 92(4):1318-1325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.022
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献