Abstract
Introduction: The article dwells on major legislative and methodical aspects related to the latest update of the system for air quality management in the country.
Objective: To summarize the experience in applying the health risk assessment procedure to the system of new mechanisms for ambient air quality monitoring and management.
Materials and methods: The study relied on the results obtained by summary estimates of dispersion of emissions from 1.5 to 6.5 thousand sources per city and health risk assessment in twelve cities included in the Federal Clean Air Project. We also analyzed the results of biomedical studies (about two thousand chemical, immunological, and clinical tests done in 2020–2022) in and outside the zones of influence of mining and chemical industries.
Results: Health risks were estimated as unacceptable in the cities included in the experiment on introducing new emission control technologies. In some cases, risks were rated as “very high” for diseases of the respiratory system, blood and blood-forming organs, musculoskeletal system, etc. We substantiated the lists of priority pollutants for emission monitoring and quoting and the lists of priority objects generating unacceptable risks. We demonstrate that the evaluation of health damage as an indicator of realized risks under certain circumstances can serve as yet another evidence of adverse health effects of environmental pollution. We suggest a fundamental algorithm for including the assessment of human health risks and damages into the system of air quality management for elaboration of the existing regulatory and methodological framework of monitoring and standardization.
Conclusions: The procedures of assessing health risks and damages are a significant component of air quality management.
Their results ensure adequacy of the monitoring programs to the current situation, make managerial actions more targeted and precise, and guarantee optimal achievement of the major goal to preserve public health through safe and comfortable environment.
Publisher
Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science
Reference22 articles.
1. Brunekreef B. Environmental epidemiology and risk assessment. Toxicol Lett. 2008;180(2):118-122. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.012
2. Rakhmanin YA, Novikov SM, Avaliani SL, Sinitsyna OO, Shashina TA. Actual problems of environmental factors risk assessment on human health and ways to improve it. Health Risk Analysis. 2015;(2):4-9. (In Russ.)
3. Mamyrbaev AA, Sakebaeva LD, Sabyrakhmetova VM, Karashova GI, Shayakhmetova KN, Umarova GA. Assessment of risk of non-carcinogenic effects due to the pollution of atmospheric air in residential areas of Uralsk city. Meditsinskiy Zhurnal Zapadnogo Kazakhstana. 2016;(1(49)):82–88. (In Russ.)
4. Kokoulina AA, Balashov SYu, Zagorodnov SYu, Koshurnikov DN. Hygienic evaluation of objects concerning extraction, preparation and primary processing of oil, considering health risk parameters. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2016;(12):34–38. (In Russ.)
5. Kliucininkas L, Velykienė D. Environmental health damage factors assessment in brownfield redevelopment. WIT Transactions on Biomedicine and Health. 2009;14:179-186. doi: 10.2495/EHR090181
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献