COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION ACCOUNTING METHODS BY PINE-BIRCH FOREST PLANTATIONS IN VORONEZH REGION-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION ACCOUNTING METHODS BY PINE-BIRCH FOREST PLANTATIONS IN VORONEZH REGION

Published:2022-10-13 Issue:3 Volume:12 Page:4-15
ISSN:2222-7962
Container-title:Forestry Engineering Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Mamonov Dmitry¹,Morkovina Svetlana¹,Matveev Sergey¹,Sheshnitsan Sergey¹,Ivetić Vladan²

Affiliation:

1. Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G.F. Morozov

2. University of Belgrade

Abstract

Current state of forest carbon budget accounting both in Russia and abroad is characterized by wide variety of methodological approaches and models. Therefore, final estimates have discrepancies. The results of comparative analysis of methods used to assess carbon sequestration in pine-birch forest stands are presented. The composition, growth and biological productivity of forest stands were analyzed as well as carbon stock was calculated for pine-birch forest stands in various age groups in the Central Forest-Steppe. The dynamics of biological productivity of modal forest stands with mixed composition is investigated. Significant differences were found in quantitative assessment of carbon deposited by forest stands obtained with three different methodologies. Discrepancies in carbon content estimations in forest stands with different age and composition obtained by different methods vary from 2.0 to 33.9%. The problem of reliable assessment of carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems of the Central Forest-Steppe requires regional approaches in development of assessment methods to provide precise results and minimize uncertainty of evaluations

Publisher

Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G.F. Morozov

Subject

General Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Huang L., Zhou M., Ly J., Chen K. Trends in global research in forest carbon sequestration: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;252: 119908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119908., Huang L., Zhou M., Ly J., Chen K. Trends in global research in forest carbon sequestration: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;252: 119908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119908.

2. Lin B., Ge J. Valued forest carbon sinks: How much emissions abatement costs could be reduced in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;224: 455–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.221., Lin B., Ge J. Valued forest carbon sinks: How much emissions abatement costs could be reduced in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;224: 455–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.221.

3. Shu Sh., Zhu W., Wang W. et al. Effects of tree size heterogeneity on carbon sink in old forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 2019;432: 637–648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.023., Shu Sh., Zhu W., Wang W. et al. Effects of tree size heterogeneity on carbon sink in old forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 2019;432: 637–648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.023.

4. Haenssgen M. J., Lechner A. M., Rakotonarivo S. et al. Implementation of the COP26 declaration to halt forest loss must safeguard and include Indigenous people. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2022;6: 235–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01650-6., Haenssgen M. J., Lechner A. M., Rakotonarivo S. et al. Implementation of the COP26 declaration to halt forest loss must safeguard and include Indigenous people. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2022;6: 235–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01650-6.

5. Schepaschenko D., Karminov V., See L. et al. Russian forest sequesters substantially more carbon than previously reported. Scientific Reports. 2021;11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92152-9., Schepaschenko D., Karminov V., See L. et al. Russian forest sequesters substantially more carbon than previously reported. Scientific Reports. 2021;11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92152-9.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Economic effect of carbon storage due to forest management intensification: analysis and forecast for the Republic of Karelia;Russian Journal of Economics and Law;2023-12-13

2. Influence of forest belts on the total content of Pb and Cd and their exchange compounds in leached chernozems;Forestry Engineering Journal;2023-05-16

3. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MEASURES TO REDUCE EMISSIONS AND INCREASE THE ABSORPTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES IN THE ADAPTATION OF REGIONAL SYSTEMS TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE SPHERE OF NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;Учет и статистика;2022-12-02