Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms

Published:2020-03-02 Issue:3 Volume:3 Page:e200265
ISSN:2574-3805
Container-title:JAMA Network Open
language:en
Short-container-title:JAMA Netw Open

Author:

Schaffter Thomas¹,Buist Diana S. M.²,Lee Christoph I.³,Nikulin Yaroslav⁴,Ribli Dezso⁵,Guan Yuanfang⁶,Lotter William⁷,Jie Zequn⁸,Du Hao⁹,Wang Sijia¹⁰,Feng Jiashi¹¹,Feng Mengling¹²,Kim Hyo-Eun¹³,Albiol Francisco¹⁴,Albiol Alberto¹⁵,Morrell Stephen¹⁶,Wojna Zbigniew¹⁷,Ahsen Mehmet Eren¹⁸,Asif Umar¹⁹,Jimeno Yepes Antonio¹⁹,Yohanandan Shivanthan¹⁹,Rabinovici-Cohen Simona²⁰,Yi Darvin²¹,Hoff Bruce¹,Yu Thomas¹,Chaibub Neto Elias¹,Rubin Daniel L.²²,Lindholm Peter²³,Margolies Laurie R.²⁴,McBride Russell Bailey²⁵,Rothstein Joseph H.²⁶,Sieh Weiva²⁷,Ben-Ari Rami²⁰,Harrer Stefan¹⁹,Trister Andrew²⁸,Friend Stephen¹,Norman Thea²⁹,Sahiner Berkman³⁰,Strand Fredrik³¹³²,Guinney Justin¹,Stolovitzky Gustavo³³,Mackey Lester³⁴,Cahoon Joyce³⁵,Shen Li³⁶,Sohn Jae Ho³⁷,Trivedi Hari³⁸,Shen Yiqiu³⁹,Buturovic Ljubomir⁴⁰,Pereira Jose Costa⁴¹,Cardoso Jaime S.⁴¹,Castro Eduardo⁴¹,Kalleberg Karl Trygve⁴²,Pelka Obioma⁴³⁴⁴,Nedjar Imane⁴⁵,Geras Krzysztof J.⁴⁶,Nensa Felix⁴⁴,Goan Ethan⁴⁷,Koitka Sven⁴³⁴⁶,Caballero Luis¹⁴,Cox David D.⁴⁸,Krishnaswamy Pavitra⁴⁹,Pandey Gaurav²⁶⁵⁰,Friedrich Christoph M.⁴³,Perrin Dimitri⁴⁷,Fookes Clinton⁴⁷,Shi Bibo⁵¹,Cardoso Negrie Gerard⁵²,Kawczynski Michael⁵³,Cho Kyunghyun³⁹,Khoo Can Son⁵⁴,Lo Joseph Y.⁵⁵,Sorensen A. Gregory⁷,Jung Hwejin⁵⁶,

Affiliation:

1. Computational Oncology, Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, Washington

2. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington

3. University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle

4. Therapixel, Paris, France

5. Department of Physics of Complex Systems, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary

6. Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

7. DeepHealth Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts

8. Tencent AI Lab, Shenzhen, China

9. National University of Singapore, Singapore

10. Integrated Health Information Systems Pte Ltd, Singapore

11. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore

12. National University Health System, Singapore

13. Lunit Inc, Seoul, Korea

14. Instituto de Física Corpuscular (IFIC), CSIC–Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain

15. Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, Valenciana, Spain

16. Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, Bloomsbury, London, United Kingdom

17. Tensorflight Inc, Mountain View, California

18. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana

19. IBM Research Australia, Melbourne, Australia

20. IBM Research Haifa, Haifa University Campus, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel

21. Stanford University, Stanford, California

22. Department of Biomedical Data Science, Radiology, and Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, Stanford, California

23. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

24. Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

25. Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

26. Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

27. Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

28. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington

29. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington

30. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland

31. Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

32. Breast Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

33. IBM Research, Translational Systems Biology and Nanobiotechnology, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York

34. Microsoft New England Research and Development Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts

35. North Carolina State University, Raleigh

36. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

37. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco

38. Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

39. New York University, New York

40. Clinical Persona, East Palo Alto, California

41. Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, Porto, Portugal

42. KolibriFX, Oslo, Norway

43. Department of Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Dortmund, Germany

44. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

45. Biomedical Engineering Laboratory Tlemcen University, Tlemcen, Algeria

46. Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York

47. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

48. MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab, IBM Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts

49. Institute for Infocomm Research, A*STAR, Singapore

50. Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, New York, New York

51. Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

52. Satalia, London, United Kingdom

53. Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco

54. University College London, London, United Kingdom

55. Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

56. Korea University, Seoul, Korea

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Link

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/articlepdf/2761795/schaffter_2020_oi_200024.pdf

Reference35 articles.

1. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.;Nelson;Ann Intern Med,2009

2. National performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography: update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.;Lehman;Radiology,2017

3. Harms of breast cancer screening: systematic review to update the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.;Nelson;Ann Intern Med,2016

4. Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States: comparison of current practice and advocated guidelines.;O’Donoghue;Ann Intern Med,2014

5. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer screening: opportunity or hype?;Houssami;Breast,2017

Cited by 278 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mammography classification with multi-view deep learning techniques: Investigating graph and transformer-based architectures;Medical Image Analysis;2025-01

2. The STOIC2021 COVID-19 AI challenge: Applying reusable training methodologies to private data;Medical Image Analysis;2024-10

3. Artificial intelligence as an initial reader for double reading in breast cancer screening: a prospective initial study of 32,822 mammograms of the Egyptian population;Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine;2024-09-12

4. Artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis abnormality score trends in the serial mammography of patients with breast cancer;European Journal of Radiology;2024-09

5. Comparison of AI-integrated pathways with human-AI interaction in population mammographic screening for breast cancer;Nature Communications;2024-08-30