Omission of Axillary Dissection Following Nodal Downstaging With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Author:

Montagna Giacomo1,Mrdutt Mary M.2,Sun Susie X.3,Hlavin Callie4,Diego Emilia J.4,Wong Stephanie M.56,Barrio Andrea V.1,van den Bruele Astrid Botty7,Cabioglu Neslihan8,Sevilimedu Varadan9,Rosenberger Laura H.7,Hwang E. Shelley7,Ingham Abigail10,Papassotiropoulos Bärbel11,Nguyen-Sträuli Bich Doan12,Kurzeder Christian1314,Aybar Danilo Díaz15,Vorburger Denise16,Matlac Dieter Michael17,Ostapenko Edvin1819,Riedel Fabian20,Fitzal Florian1821,Meani Francesco2223,Fick Franziska17,Sagasser Jacqueline24,Heil Jörg20,Karanlık Hasan25,Dedes Konstantin J.12,Romics Laszlo10,Banys-Paluchowski Maggie17,Muslumanoglu Mahmut8,Perez Maria Del Rosario Cueva15,Díaz Marcelo Chávez15,Heidinger Martin1314,Fehr Mathias K.26,Reinisch Mattea2728,Tukenmez Mustafa8,Maggi Nadia1314,Rocco Nicola29,Ditsch Nina24,Gentilini Oreste Davide30,Paulinelli Regis R.31,Zarhi Sebastián Solé32,Kuemmel Sherko2728,Bruzas Simona27,di Lascio Simona2233,Parissenti Tamara K.26,Hoskin Tanya L.2,Güth Uwe11,Ovalle Valentina32,Tausch Christoph1114,Kuerer Henry M.3,Caudle Abigail S.3,Boileau Jean-Francois56,Boughey Judy C.2,Kühn Thorsten34,Morrow Monica1,Weber Walter P.1314

Affiliation:

1. Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

2. Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

3. Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston

4. Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

5. Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

6. Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

7. Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

8. Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Breast Surgery Service, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

9. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

10. University of Glasgow and National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Department of Academic Surgery, Glasgow, Scotland

11. Breast-Center Zurich AG, Zurich, Switzerland

12. Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

13. Breast Center, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

14. University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

15. Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen National Hospital, Lima, Peru

16. Breast Cancer Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

17. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

18. Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

19. Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

20. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Unit, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

21. Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria

22. Centro di Senologia della Svizzera Italiana, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland

23. Gruppo Ospedaliero Moncucco, Ticino, Switzerland

24. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

25. Division of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

26. Breast Center Thurgau, Frauenfeld, Switzerland

27. Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center/Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany

28. Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany

29. Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy

30. Breast Surgery, San Raffaele University and Research Hospital, Milan, Italy

31. Federal University of Goiás, Araujo Jorge Cancer Hospital, Goiás, Brazil

32. Department of Radiation Oncology, IRAM–Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile

33. Service of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland

34. Department of Gynecology, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany

Abstract

ImportanceData on oncological outcomes after omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with breast cancer that downstages from node positive to negative with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are sparse. Additionally, the best axillary surgical staging technique in this scenario is unknown.ObjectiveTo investigate oncological outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with dual-tracer mapping or targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which combines SLNB with localization and retrieval of the clipped lymph node.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this multicenter retrospective cohort study that was conducted at 25 centers in 11 countries, 1144 patients with consecutive stage II to III biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer were included between April 2013 and December 2020. The cumulative incidence rates of axillary, locoregional, and any invasive (locoregional or distant) recurrence were determined by competing risk analysis.ExposureOmission of ALND after SLNB or TAD.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end points were the 3-year and 5-year rates of any axillary recurrence. Secondary end points included locoregional recurrence, any invasive (locoregional and distant) recurrence, and the number of lymph nodes removed.ResultsA total of 1144 patients (median [IQR] age, 50 [41-59] years; 78 [6.8%] Asian, 105 [9.2%] Black, 102 [8.9%] Hispanic, and 816 [71.0%] White individuals; 666 SLNB [58.2%] and 478 TAD [41.8%]) were included. A total of 1060 patients (93%) had N1 disease, 619 (54%) had ERBB2 (formerly HER2)–positive illness, and 758 (66%) had a breast pathologic complete response. TAD patients were more likely to receive nodal radiation therapy (85% vs 78%; P = .01). The clipped node was successfully retrieved in 97% of TAD cases and 86% of SLNB cases (without localization). The mean (SD) number of sentinel lymph nodes retrieved was 3 (2) vs 4 (2) (P < .001), and the mean (SD) number of total lymph nodes removed was 3.95 (1.97) vs 4.44 (2.04) (P < .001) in the TAD and SLNB groups, respectively. The 5-year rates of any axillary, locoregional, and any invasive recurrence in the entire cohort were 1.0% (95% CI, 0.49%-2.0%), 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.1%), and 10% (95% CI, 8.3%-13%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence did not differ between TAD and SLNB (0.5% vs 0.8%; P = .55).Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cohort study showed that axillary recurrence was rare in this setting and was not significantly lower after TAD vs SLNB. These results support omission of ALND in this population.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3