Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Early Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer and Interstitial Lung Disease

Author:

Palma David A.1,Bahig Houda2,Hope Andrew3,Harrow Stephen4,Debenham Brock J.5,Louie Alexander V.6,Vu Thi Trinh Thuc (Toni)2,Filion Edith2,Bezjak Andrea3,Campeau Marie-Pierre2,Duimering Adele5,Giuliani Meredith E.3,Laba Joanna M.1,Lang Pencilla1,Lok Benjamin H.3,Qu X. Melody1,Raman Srinivas3,Rodrigues George B.1,Goodman Christopher D.1,Gaede Stewart7,Morisset Julie8,Warner Andrew1,Dhaliwal Inderdeep9,Ryerson Christopher J.10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada

2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Edinburgh, Scotland

5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

6. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

7. Department of Medical Physics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada

8. Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

9. Department of Respirology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada

10. Department of Medicine and Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

ImportancePatients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been reported to be at high risk of toxic effects after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), but for many patients, there are limited alternative treatment options.ObjectiveTo prospectively assess the benefits and toxic effects of SABR in this patient population.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective cohort study was conducted at 6 academic radiation oncology institutions, 5 in Canada and 1 in Scotland, with accrual between March 7, 2019, and January 12, 2022. Patients aged 18 years or older with fibrotic ILD and a diagnosis of T1-2N0 NSCLC who were not candidates for surgical resection were enrolled.InterventionPatients were treated with SABR to a dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions every other day.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe study prespecified that SABR would be considered worthwhile if median overall survival—the primary end point—was longer than 1 year, with a grade 3 to 4 risk of toxic effects less than 35% and a grade 5 risk of toxic effects less than 15%. Secondary end points included toxic effects, progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), quality-of-life outcomes, and changes in pulmonary function. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted.ResultsThirty-nine patients enrolled and received SABR. Median age was 78 (IQR, 67-83) years and 59% (n = 23) were male. At baseline, 70% (26 of 37) of patients reported dyspnea, median forced expiratory volume in first second of expiration was 80% (IQR, 66%-90%) predicted, median forced vital capacity was 84% (IQR, 69%-94%) predicted, and median diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was 49% (IQR, 38%-61%) predicted. Median follow-up was 19 (IQR, 14-25) months. Overall survival at 1 year was 79% (95%, CI 62%-89%; P < .001 vs the unacceptable rate), and median overall survival was 25 months (95% CI, 14 months to not reached). Median PFS was 19 months (95% CI, 13-28 months), and 2-year LC was 92% (95% CI, 69%-98%). Adverse event rates (highest grade per patient) were grade 1 to 2: n = 12 (31%), grade 3: n = 4 (10%), grade 4: n = 0, and grade 5: n = 3 (7.7%, all due to respiratory deterioration).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this trial, use of SABR in patients with fibrotic ILD met the prespecified acceptability thresholds for both toxicity and efficacy, supporting the use of SABR for curative-intent treatment after a careful discussion of risks and benefits.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03485378

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3