Affiliation:
1. Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine—Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix
2. Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson
3. Department of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, Texas
4. Department of Public Health, University of Texas at San Antonio
5. Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of EMS, Phoenix
6. Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson
Abstract
ImportanceThe Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) study demonstrated improved survival in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) following implementation of the prehospital treatment guidelines. The impact of implementing these guidelines in the subgroup of patients who received positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is unknown.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of implementation of prehospital TBI evidence-based guidelines with survival among patients with prehospital PPV.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe EPIC study was a multisystem, intention-to-treat study using a before/after controlled design. Evidence-based guidelines were implemented by emergency medical service agencies across Arizona. This subanalysis was planned a priori and included participants who received prehospital PPV. Outcomes were compared between the preimplementation and postimplementation cohorts using logistic regression, stratified by predetermined TBI severity categories (moderate, severe, or critical). Data were collected from January 2007 to June 2017, and data were analyzed from January to February 2023.ExposureImplementation of the evidence-based guidelines for the prehospital care of patient with TBI.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge, and the secondary outcome was survival to admission.ResultsAmong the 21 852 participants in the main study, 5022 received prehospital PPV (preimplementation, 3531 participants; postimplementation, 1491 participants). Of 5022 included participants, 3720 (74.1%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 36 (22-54) years. Across all severities combined, survival to admission improved (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59; 95% CI, 1.28-1.97), while survival to discharge did not (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78-1.13). Within the cohort with severe TBI but not in the moderate or critical subgroups, survival to hospital admission increased (aOR, 6.44; 95% CI, 2.39-22.00), as did survival to discharge (aOR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.96-6.34).Conclusions and RelevanceAmong patients with severe TBI who received active airway interventions in the field, guideline implementation was independently associated with improved survival to hospital admission and discharge. This was true whether they received basic airway interventions or advanced airways. These findings support the current guideline recommendations for aggressive prevention/correction of hypoxia and hyperventilation in patients with severe TBI, regardless of which airway type is used.
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Reference58 articles.
1. Traumatic brain injury-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths—United States, 2007 and 2013.;Taylor;MMWR Surveill Summ,2017
2. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury.;Brain Trauma Foundation;J Neurotrauma,2007
3. Guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury 2nd edition.;Badjatia;Prehosp Emerg Care,2008
4. Guidelines for the acute medical management of severe traumatic brain injury in infants, children, and adolescents--second edition.;Kochanek;Pediatr Crit Care Med,2012
5. Pediatric traumatic brain injury: past, present and future.;Jankowitz;Dev Neurosci,2006
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献