Preliminary Evidence for Genetic Nurture in Depression and Neuroticism Through Polygenic Scores

Abstract

ImportanceModeling genetic nurture (ie, the effects of parental genotypes through influences on the environment experienced by their children) is essential to accurately disentangle genetic and environmental influences on phenotypic variance. However, these influences are often ignored in both epidemiologic and genetic studies of depression.ObjectiveTo estimate the association of genetic nurture with depression and neuroticism.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study jointly modeled parental and offspring polygenic scores (PGSs) across 9 traits to test for the association of genetic nurture with lifetime broad depression and neuroticism using data from nuclear families in the UK Biobank, with data collected between 2006 and 2019. A broad depression phenotype was measured in 38 702 offspring from 20 905 independent nuclear families, with most of these participants also reporting neuroticism scores. Parental genotypes were imputed from sibships or parent-offspring duos and used to calculate parental PGSs. Data were analyzed between March 2021 and January 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresEstimates of genetic nurture and direct genetic regression coefficients on broad depression and neuroticism.ResultsThis study of 38 702 offspring with data on broad depression (mean [SD] age, 55.5 [8.2] years at study entry; 58% female) found limited preliminary evidence for a statistically significant association of genetic nurture with lifetime depression and neuroticism in adults. The estimated regression coefficient of the parental depression PGS on offspring neuroticism (β = 0.04, SE = 0.02, P = 6.63 × 10−3) was estimated to be approximately two-thirds (66%) that of the offspring’s depression PGS (β = 0.06, SE = 0.01, P = 6.13 × 10−11). Evidence for an association between parental cannabis use disorder PGS and offspring depression was also found (β = 0.08, SE = 0.03, P = .02), which was estimated to be 2 times greater than the association between the offspring’s cannabis use disorder PGS and their own depression status (β = 0.04, SE = 0.02, P = .07).Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cross-sectional study highlight the potential for genetic nurture to bias results from epidemiologic and genetic studies on depression or neuroticism and, with further replication and larger samples, identify potential avenues for future prevention and intervention efforts.