Peer Comparison or Guideline-Based Feedback and Postsurgery Opioid Prescriptions

Author:

Wagner Zachary1,Kirkegaard Allison1,Mariano Louis T.2,Doctor Jason N.3,Yan Xiaowei4,Persell Stephen D.5,Goldstein Noah J.6,Fox Craig R.6,Brummett Chad M.7,Romanelli Robert J.48,Bouskill Kathryn1,Martinez Meghan4,Zanocco Kyle9,Meeker Daniella1011,Mudiganti Satish4,Waljee Jennifer7,Watkins Katherine E.1

Affiliation:

1. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California

2. RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia

3. Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles

4. Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, California

5. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Primary Care Innovation, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

6. Anderson School of Management, Department of Psychology, and Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles

7. University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor

8. RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom

9. Section of Endocrine Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California

10. Keck School of Medicine, USC Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, Los Angeles, California

11. Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

Abstract

ImportanceExcess opioid prescribing after surgery can result in prolonged use and diversion. Email feedback based on social norms may reduce the number of pills prescribed.ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of 2 social norm-based interventions on reducing guideline-discordant opioid prescribing after surgery.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cluster randomized clinical trial conducted at a large health care delivery system in northern California between October 2021 and October 2022 included general, obstetric/gynecologic, and orthopedic surgeons with patients aged 18 years or older discharged to home with an oral opioid prescription.InterventionsIn 19 hospitals, 3 surgical specialties (general, orthopedic, and obstetric/gynecologic) were randomly assigned to a control group or 1 of 2 interventions. The guidelines intervention provided email feedback to surgeons on opioid prescribing relative to institutionally endorsed guidelines; the peer comparison intervention provided email feedback on opioid prescribing relative to that of peer surgeons. Emails were sent to surgeons with at least 2 guideline-discordant prescriptions in the previous month. The control group had no intervention.Main Outcome and MeasuresThe probability that a discharged patient was prescribed a quantity of opioids above the guideline for the respective procedure during the 12 intervention months.ResultsThere were 38 235 patients discharged from 640 surgeons during the 12-month intervention period. Control-group surgeons prescribed above guidelines 36.8% of the time during the intervention period compared with 27.5% and 25.4% among surgeons in the peer comparison and guidelines arms, respectively. In adjusted models, the peer comparison intervention reduced guideline-discordant prescribing by 5.8 percentage points (95% CI, −10.5 to −1.1; P = .03) and the guidelines intervention reduced it by 4.7 percentage points (95% CI, −9.4 to −0.1; P = .05). Effects were driven by surgeons who performed more surgeries and had more guideline-discordant prescribing at baseline. There was no significant difference between interventions.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cluster randomized clinical trial, email feedback based on either guidelines or peer comparison reduced opioid prescribing after surgery. Guideline-based feedback was as effective as peer comparison-based feedback. These interventions are simple, low-cost, and scalable, and may reduce downstream opioid misuse.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05070338

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3