Affiliation:
1. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
2. Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts
3. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston Healthcare System, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
4. Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
5. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
6. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Abstract
ImportanceMedicare Advantage plans have strong incentives to reduce potentially wasteful health care, including costly acute care visits for ambulatory care−sensitive conditions (ACSCs). However, it remains unknown whether Medicare Advantage plans lower acute care use compared with traditional Medicare, or if it shifts patients from hospitalization to observation stays and emergency department (ED) direct discharges.ObjectiveTo determine whether Medicare Advantage is associated with differential utilization of hospitalizations, observations, and ED direct discharges for ACSCs compared with traditional Medicare.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsCross-sectional study of US Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare beneficiaries from January 1 to December 31, 2018. Poisson regression models were used to compare risk-adjusted rates of Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare, controlling for patient demographic characteristics and clinical risk and including county fixed-effects. Data were analyzed between April 2021 and April 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresHospitalizations, observation stays, and ED direct discharges for ACSCs.ResultsThe study sample comprised 2 754 630 Medicare Advantage patients (mean [SD] age, 72.9 [9.9] years; 1 549 233 [56.2%] women; 1 926 437 [69.9%] White individuals) and 6 349 693 traditional Medicare patients (mean [SD] age, 72.3 [11.9] years; 3 479 387 [54.8%] women; 5 073 742 [79.9%] White individuals). Medicare Advantage patients had lower risk of hospitalization for ACSCs compared with traditional Medicare patients (relative risk [RR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.91-0.92), primarily owing to fewer hospitalizations for acute conditions (eg, pneumonia). Medicare Advantage patients had a higher risk of ED direct discharges (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.29-1.31) and observation stays (RR, 2.18; 95% CI, 2.15-2.21) for ACSCs vs traditional Medicare patients. Overall, Medicare Advantage patients were at higher risk of needing care for an ACSC (hospitalization, ED direct discharge, or observation stay) than traditional Medicare patients (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.19-1.20). Within the Medicare Advantage population, patients in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) were at lower risk of ACSC-related hospitalization compared with patients in its preferred provider organizations (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97); however, those in the HMOs had a higher risk of ED direct discharge (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.09) and observation stay (overall RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07-1.13).Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this cross-sectional study of Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare patients with ACSCs indicate that apparent gains in lowering rates of potentially avoidable acute care have been associated with shifting inpatient care to settings such as ED direct discharges and observation stays.
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献