Association Between the Medicare Advantage Quartile Adjustment System and Plan Behavior and Enrollment

Author:

Murray Roslyn C.1,Meyers David J.2,Fuse Brown Erin C3,Williams Travis C.3,Ryan Andrew M.2

Affiliation:

1. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

2. Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island

3. Georgia State University, Atlanta

Abstract

ImportanceMedicare Advantage (MA) has grown in popularity, but critics believe that insurers are overpaid, partially due to the quartile adjustment system that determines plan benchmarks. However, elimination of the quartile adjustments may be associated with less generous benefits and fewer plan offerings, which could slow MA enrollment growth.ObjectiveTo examine whether the quartile adjustment system is associated with differences in county-level benefits, insurer offerings, and MA enrollment.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe quartile adjustments create discontinuous jumps in county-level base payments based on historical traditional Medicare spending. Data from January 2017 to December 2021 and a regression discontinuity design were used to examine changes in insurer behavior and MA enrollment between quartiles. The analytic sample included 1557 county observations.Main Outcomes and MeasuresStudy outcomes included monthly premiums, the share of plans charging premiums, primary care copayments, the share of plans using rebates to reduce Part B premiums, supplemental benefits, plan and contract availability, and MA enrollment.ResultsDiscontinuities were found in the quartile adjustments and benchmarks. A 1–percentage point (pp) increase in the quartile adjustment was associated with a $6.36 increase in monthly benchmarks (95% CI, 5.10-7.62), a $0.51 decrease in monthly premiums (95% CI, −0.96 to −0.07), and a 0.68 pp decrease in the share of plans charging premiums (95% CI, −1.25 to −0.10). Significant changes were not found in primary care copayments (-$0.04; 95% CI, −0.17 to 0.09), the share of plans using rebates to reduce Part B premiums (−0.17 pp; 95% CI, −0.34 to 0.01), supplemental benefits (eg, preventive dental coverage; 0.17 pp; 95% CI, −0.25 to 0.0), the number of plans (1.06; 95% CI, −3.44 to 5.57) or contracts (0.31; 95% CI, −0.18 to 0.81), or the MA enrollment rate (0.16 pp; 95% CI, −0.61 to 0.94).Conclusions and RelevanceThe study results suggest that MA plans are not very sensitive to modest changes in payment rates. Modifications to the quartile adjustment system may generate savings without substantially affecting MA beneficiaries.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference30 articles.

1. Health care utilization and spending in Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare: a difference-in-differences analysis.;Schwartz;JAMA Health Forum,2021

2. A comparison of relative resource use and quality in Medicare Advantage health plans versus traditional Medicare.;Landon;Am J Manag Care,2015

3. Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service performance on clinical quality and patient experience measures: comparisons from three large states.;Timbie;Health Serv Res,2017

4. Legislative and regulatory options for improving Medicare Advantage.;Fuse Brown;J Health Polit Policy Law,2023

5. Upcoding: evidence from Medicare on squishy risk adjustment.;Geruso;J Polit Econ,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3