Affiliation:
1. Institute for Informatics and Automation Problems National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia;
Medical Physics Department at the Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi
2. Public Administration Academy of the Republic of Armenia
3. Committee of Science of the Republic of Armenia
Abstract
Improving the efficiency of the use of public funds directed at scientific and technological research and development is one of the urgent problems of our time. Among the possible solutions is scientific organizations funding according to their results. With this aim, a number of countries have implemented evaluation of their scientific organizations productivity at the national level. Evaluation of the effectiveness of organizations engaged in scientific and technical R&D, and the distribution of funding according to the results of such evaluation there are in the UK (the first country to introduce such practices), Italy and Russia. Starting from 2020, the Republic of Armenia is also planning to invest a rating model for financing state scientific organizations.The article presents the model of rating financing of the state scientific organizations in Armenia, developed and proposed by the Committee on science of the Republic of Armenia. The introduction of the model will lead to the formation of additional financial resources and increase the efficiency of budget financing, as it will be done with the account of results of a scientific organization.
Publisher
State Public Scientific Technological Library SB RAS
Reference20 articles.
1. Guskov A. E., Kosyakov D. V., Selivanova I. V. Method to assess the efficiency of scientific organizations. Vestnik Rossiskoi academii nauk, 2018, 88(5), 430–443. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.7868/S0869587318050092.
2. Abramo G., D’Angelo C. A., Pugini F. The measurement of Italian universities’ research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics, 2008, 76(2), 225–244. DOI: 10.1007/s11192007-1942-2.
3. Abramo G., D’Angelo C. A. Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(3), 499–514. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0352-7.
4. Aksnes D. W. When different persons have an identical author name. How frequent are homonyms? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(5), 838–841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20788.
5. Aksnes D. W., Taxt R. E. Peers reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at Norvegian University. Research Evaluation, 2004, 13(1), 33–41. DOI: 10.3152/147154404781776563.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献