Ground-Motion Model for Hard-Rock Sites by Correction of Surface Recordings (Part 1): Comparison of Site-Response Estimates at KiK-Net Sites

Author:

Shible Hussein12ORCID,Hollender Fabrice12ORCID,Traversa Paola3ORCID,Bard Pierre-Yves2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1CEA, DEN, Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France

2. 2ISTerre, Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS, IRD, IFSTTAR, Grenoble, France

3. 3EDF-DIPNN-DI-TEGG, Aix-en-Provence, France

Abstract

ABSTRACT Site-specific seismic hazard assessment involves the prior knowledge of (1) the input ground motion at the local bedrock and (2) the site response. In this article and its companion, we address the deconvolution approach to obtain a reference ground-motion model, which consists of removing site effects from surface ground-motion recordings. Laurendeau et al. (2018) applied this approach on the KiK-net network with site response from 1D SH-wave (1DSH) simulations, calculated using the VS profiles available for most sites. Indeed, this approach presents several limitations with 1DSH site response if it is considered to be applied to other networks, especially in the European context. First, the approach requires identification of sites with dominant 1D effects. Second, it needs the presence of accurately measured VS profiles. In this context, we propose to derive deconvolved ground-motion models using site response from generalized inversion techniques () for two main reasons. The first reason is that the GIT delivers empirical site response for all types of sites, conditioned by the presence of sufficient amount of data, and the second is that it reduces the need for VS profiles. We focus on the estimation of site effects from different approaches and present a methodology to obtain reliable site terms from GIT based on the experience from previous studies. We also introduce and detail the difference between absolute and relative site response, which mainly depends on the chosen reference. We estimate and compare site response for the KiK-net stations with different methods, that is, empirical and theoretical 1DSH. We also conclude a list of 1D sites based on comparisons between theoretical and empirical estimates of site response. The results obtained in this article will be the primary input for the deconvolution approach applied in the companion article.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3