Features of responsibility of future specialists of the socionomic professions as an indicator of their digital competence

Author:

Bondarchuk OlenaORCID,Balakhtar ValentynaORCID,Gorova OlenaORCID,Lytvynenko NinaORCID,Pinchuk NataliiaORCID,Shmanko OlehORCID,Kiv ArnoldORCID,Oleksiuk VasylORCID

Abstract

The article dwells on to the study of the responsibility of future specialists of socionomic professions as an important indicator of their digital competence. The role of responsibility as a vital indicator of digital competence of future specialists of socionomic professions was determined, which determines their conscious and responsible activities in the context of obtaining and disseminating information in the digital space, promoting both their own psychological safety alongside psychological safety of other members of the digital community. The results of an empirical study were highlighted, which revealed an insufficient level of both responsibility and cognitive-operational components of digital competence for a significant number of future specialists in socionomic professions. Gender differences in the manifestations of responsibility of future specialists depending on the gender are characterized according to which the female respondents were slightly more responsible for the consequences of dissemination of information than male specialists. The expediency of promoting the development of responsibility of future specialists of socionomic professions as an indicator of their digital competence is stated, which can be provided in a specially organized psychological training.

Publisher

Academy of Cognitive and Natural Sciences

Reference115 articles.

1. Agazzi, E., 2009. Why has science also moral dimensions? Questions of philosophy, (10), pp.93–104. Available from: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=73.

2. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations

3. What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility

4. Babayeva, Y.D. and Voiskunsky, A.E., 1998. Psikhologicheskie posledstviia informatizatcii (Psychological consequences of informatization). Psychological journal, 19(1), pp.89–100. Available from: http://www.psy.msu.ru/science/public/voyskunskiy/babaeva&voyskunskiy_1998.pdf.

5. Bakhtin, M.M., 1986. To the philosophy of action. Philosophy and sociology of science and technology. yearbook 1984-1985. pp.80–160.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3