Abstract
Penang is arguably one of the most developed and urbanized areas in Malaysia. Like most cities typical of Southeast Asia, Penang experiences significant traffic congestion ,regularly. When the current government was established in Penang in 2008, it aimed to transform the region into a sustainable state. Among the efforts to achieve this goal was a drive towards cycling as a viable mode of transport, which entailed building cycling infrastructure, staging cycling events, and establishing a bike-share system. Despite these consistent efforts by the state government, utility cycling, or commuting cycling, is still a rare sight in Penang. This paper, therefore, attempts to assess the current situation surrounding utility cycling in Penang Island by highlighting the key factors that either enable or discourage utility cycling there. Data were collected from 25 personal interviews with cyclists and other cycling stakeholders. The findings from this data highlight key issues that will help the state government create an action-oriented path toward better utility cycling, thus fulfilling the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Reference55 articles.
1. Adam, L., Jones, T., & Te Brömmelstroet, M. (2020). Planning for cycling in the dispersed city: Establishing a hierarchy of effectiveness of municipal cycling policies. Transportation, 47(2), 503-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9878-3
2. Aldred, R. (2019). Built environment interventions to increase active travel: A critical review and discussion. Current Environmental Health Reports, 6(4), 309-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-019-00254-4
3. Akar, G., & Clifton, K. J. (2009). Influence of individual perceptions and bicycle infrastructure on decision to bike. Transportation Research Record: Journal of The Transportation Research Board, 2140(1), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.3141%2F2140-18
4. Bakker, S., Guillen, M. D., & Nanthachatchavankul, P. (2016). Cycling as a mobility option for ASEAN megacities. Developments in Bangkok and Metro Manila and regional policy options. GIZ. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10718.84809
5. Bakker, S., Dematera Contreras, K., Kappiantari, M., Tuan, N. A., Guillen, M. D., Gunthawong, G., & Van Maarseveen, M. (2017). Low-carbon transport policy in four ASEAN countries: Developments in Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Sustainability, 9(7), 1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071217