Built Environment Interventions to Increase Active Travel: a Critical Review and Discussion

Author:

Aldred Rachel

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review To review the literature on built environment interventions to increase active travel, focusing on work since 2000 and on methodological choices and challenges affecting studies. Recent Findings Increasingly, there is evidence that built environment interventions can lead to more walking or cycling. Evidence is stronger for cycling than for walking interventions, and there is a relative lack of evidence around differential impacts of interventions. Some of the evidence remains methodologically weak, with much work in the ‘grey’ literature. Summary While evidence in the area continues to grow, data gaps remain. Greater use of quasi-experimental techniques, improvements in routine monitoring of smaller schemes, and the use of new big data sources are promising. More qualitative research could help develop a more sophisticated understanding of behaviour change.

Funder

University of Westminster

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation

Reference44 articles.

1. Fraser SD, Lock K. Cycling for transport and public health. Eur J Public Health [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2019 Apr 27];21(6):738–43. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article-abstract/21/6/738/493197.

2. McCormack GR, Shiell A. In search of causality: a systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults [Internet]. Vol. 8, Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 [cited 2019 Apr 27]. Available from: https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1479-5868-8-125.

3. Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA. Environmental correlates of physical activity: a review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leis Sci [Internet]. 2007 Jul [cited 2019 Apr 27];29(4):315–54. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01490400701394865.

4. Blečić I, Canu D, Cecchini A, Congiu T, Fancello G. Factors of perceived walkability: a pilot empirical study. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics) [Internet]. Springer, Cham; 2016 [cited 2019 Apr 27]. p. 125–37. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-42089-9_9.

5. Aldred R, Elliott B, Woodcock J, Goodman A. Cycling provision separated from motor traffic: a systematic review exploring whether stated preferences vary by gender and age. Transp Rev [Internet]. 2017 Jan 2 [cited 2019 Apr 27];37(1):29–55. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01441647.2016.1200156.

Cited by 45 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3