Author:
Okwonu Friday Zinzendoff,Ahad Nor Aishah,Apanapudor Joshua Sarduana,Arunaye Festus Irismisose
Abstract
Robust multivariate correlation techniques are proposed to determine the strength of the association between two or more variables of interest since the existing multivariate correlation techniques are susceptible to outliers when the data set contains random outliers. The performances of the proposed techniques were compared with the conventional multivariate correlation techniques. All techniques under study are applied on COVID-19 data sets for Malaysia and Nigeria to determine the level of association between study variables which are confirmed, discharged, and death cases. These techniques’ performances are evaluated based on the multivariate correlation (R), multivariate coefficient of determination (R^2), and Adjusted R^2. The proposed techniques showed R=0.99 and the conventional methods showed that R ranges from 0.44 to 0.73. The R^2 and the Adjusted R^2 for proposed methods are 0.98 and 0.97 while the conventional methods showed that R equals 0.53, 0.44, and 0.19 whereas Adjusted R^2 equals 0.52, 0.43, and 0.18, respectively. The proposed techniques strongly affirmed that for any patient to be discharged or die of the Covid-19, the patient must be confirmed Covid-19 positive, whereas the conventional method showed moderate to very weak affirmation. Based on the results, the proposed techniques are robust and show a very strong association between the variables of interest than the conventional techniques.
Publisher
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference29 articles.
1. Abdi, H. (2007). Multiple correlation coefficient. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics (pp. 648-651). Sage Publication.
2. Abdullah, M. B. (1990). On a robust correlation coefficient. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 39(4), 455-460. https://doi.org/10.2307/2349088
3. Armstrong, R. A. (2019). Should Pearson’s correlation coefficient be avoided? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 39(5), 316-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12636
4. Asuero, A. G., Sayago, A., & Gonzalez, A. G. (2006). The correlation coefficient: An overview. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 36(1), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408340500526766
5. Bareinboim, E., Tian, J., & Pearl, J. (2014). Recovering from selection bias in causal and statistical inference. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 28, No. 1). PKP Publishing Services Network.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献