Robust Multivariate Correlation Techniques: A Confirmation Analysis using Covid-19 Data Set

Author:

Okwonu Friday Zinzendoff,Ahad Nor Aishah,Apanapudor Joshua Sarduana,Arunaye Festus Irismisose

Abstract

Robust multivariate correlation techniques are proposed to determine the strength of the association between two or more variables of interest since the existing multivariate correlation techniques are susceptible to outliers when the data set contains random outliers. The performances of the proposed techniques were compared with the conventional multivariate correlation techniques. All techniques under study are applied on COVID-19 data sets for Malaysia and Nigeria to determine the level of association between study variables which are confirmed, discharged, and death cases. These techniques’ performances are evaluated based on the multivariate correlation (R), multivariate coefficient of determination (R^2), and Adjusted R^2. The proposed techniques showed R=0.99 and the conventional methods showed that R ranges from 0.44 to 0.73. The R^2 and the Adjusted R^2 for proposed methods are 0.98 and 0.97 while the conventional methods showed that R equals 0.53, 0.44, and 0.19 whereas Adjusted R^2 equals 0.52, 0.43, and 0.18, respectively. The proposed techniques strongly affirmed that for any patient to be discharged or die of the Covid-19, the patient must be confirmed Covid-19 positive, whereas the conventional method showed moderate to very weak affirmation. Based on the results, the proposed techniques are robust and show a very strong association between the variables of interest than the conventional techniques.

Publisher

Universiti Putra Malaysia

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference29 articles.

1. Abdi, H. (2007). Multiple correlation coefficient. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics (pp. 648-651). Sage Publication.

2. Abdullah, M. B. (1990). On a robust correlation coefficient. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 39(4), 455-460. https://doi.org/10.2307/2349088

3. Armstrong, R. A. (2019). Should Pearson’s correlation coefficient be avoided? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 39(5), 316-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12636

4. Asuero, A. G., Sayago, A., & Gonzalez, A. G. (2006). The correlation coefficient: An overview. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 36(1), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408340500526766

5. Bareinboim, E., Tian, J., & Pearl, J. (2014). Recovering from selection bias in causal and statistical inference. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 28, No. 1). PKP Publishing Services Network.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3