Conflict communications in modern media

Author:

Chumikov A. N.1

Affiliation:

1. Moscow State Linguistic University

Abstract

The author traces the dynamics of ideas about conflict communications in the media in the conditions of a revolutionary change in the information space. These changes are so global that they have led to the emergence of the term «mediatization of public life», which is defined as the process of creating virtual politics and economics and establishing a serious dependence of real spheres on their presentation in the media. In the context of the information and communication explosion, there is a phenomenon called «disappearance of fact», «meaning instead of fact», when the model of narrative presentation of facts is increasingly replaced by their interpretation and construction of meanings. The author notes that analysts are keen on fact-checking – methods of recognizing factoids, fakes; identifying other forms of manipulation of information. However, it is equally important not only to «expose» implicit influences, but also to understand that the so-called «manipulations» that characterize unacceptable methods in the media are becoming objectively inherent in media communications.Semantic interpretation of the received information and the confrontation of meanings become the inevitable and dominant forms of communication behavior in the media field of conflict. Semantic positioning involves the orientation of the audience on how to perceive this content, what it means now and in the future. In the framework of this process, according to the author, such a term as «relevance» is acceptable. It is necessary to rethink the content in the direction that is relevant for the subject of political communication, as well as to position the relevant information that does not contradict the legal acts of the state and the ethical standards of the professional community.

Publisher

The Association International Academy of Communicology

Subject

General Medicine

Reference16 articles.

1. Bimber B., Davis R. (2003). Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.

2. Chiluwa I.E., Samoilenko S.A. (2019). Handbook of research on deception, fake news, and misinformation online. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

3. Controllability and Discourse of Virtual Communities in the Context of Post-Truth Politics, Ed. D.S. Martyanova. SPb.: ElekSis, 2019 (In Rus.).

4. Fidrya E.S. (2019). Factors and logic of reconstructing the meaning of a political text in conditions of cognitive and interpretive uncertainty. Polis. No. 4. P. 40-56 (In Rus.).

5. Grachev M.N. (2021). Modeling the process of mediatization of politics. Russian PRology: trends and drivers. Issue 11. С-ПбГЭУ. P. 34-41 (In Rus.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3