Affiliation:
1. Baranovichi State University
Abstract
According to the National Security Concept, approved by Decree of the President of the Republic of Belarus dated November 9, 2010 no. 575, strengthening the institution of the family as a social institution that is most favorable for meeting the need for children and their upbringing is the main national interest in the demographic sphere. In connection with the above, the subject of this study is the legislation of the Republic of Belarus, which defines the boundaries of understanding the term “family” as a legally significant category. The purpose of the study is to identify contradictions in the legislation in terms of understanding the term “family” and its individual components. In the course of the study, general scientific methods (functional and system-structural methods), as well as special research methods in law (formal legal method and the method of legal hermeneutics) were used. Thus, in particular, the following was established. The objects of family policy are the family itself, as well as state and public institutions that directly affect its functioning and development. The key parties in the implementation of state family policy measures are the family institution as a social institution, other social institutions (economic, political, cultural, and others), as well as state institutions (parliament, government, presidency, judicial system). The area of possible application of the results of the work can be rule-making activities. Theoretical conclusions are formulated, as well as proposals are made aimed at improving the legislation of the Republic of Belarus.
Publisher
Tambov State University - G.R. Derzhavin
Reference8 articles.
1. 1. Turkaeva L.V. Pravovoye vospitaniye i obucheniye nesovershennoletnikh kak moral’nopravovoy aspekt razvitiya lichnosti [Legal education and training of minors as a moral and legal aspect of personality development]. Aktual’nye problemy gosudarstva i prava – Current Issues of the State and Law, 2020, vol. 4, no. 13, pp. 59-67. DOI 10.20310/2587-9340- 2020-4-13-59-67. (In Russian).
2. 2. Katushonok O.V. Gosudarstvennaya semeynaya politika kak odno iz napravleniy obshchesotsial’noy profilaktiki vnutrisemeynogo nasiliya [State family policy as one of the directions of general social prevention of intra-family violence]. Tezisy dokladov 6 Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 70-letiyu obrazovaniya Mogilevskogo instituta MVD «Bor’ba s prestupnost’yu: teoriya i praktika» [Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific and Practical Conference, Dedicated to 70th Anniversary of Foundation of Mogilev Institute of the MIA “Fight Against Crime: Theory and Practice Mogilev”]. Mogilev, Mogilev Institute of the MIA Publ., 2018, pp. 169-172. (In Russian).
3. 3. Ivanova N.A., Guruleva E.A. Formirovaniye printsipa dobrovol’nosti braka v rossiyskom semeynom prave [Development of voluntary marriage principle in Russian family law]. Aktual’nye problemy gosudarstva i prava – Current Issues of the State and Law, 2021, vol. 5, no. 20, pp. 716-728. DOI 10.20310/2587-9340-2021-5-20-716-728. (In Russian).
4. 4. Lesthaeghe R., Neidert L., Surkyn J. Household Formation and the Second Demographic Transition in Europe and the US: Insights from Middle Range Models. Academia, 2006. Available at: http://sdt.psc. isr.umich.edu/ (accessed 20.05.2022).
5. 5. Zabelin I.E. Istoriya russkoy zhizni s drevneyshikh vremen [The History of Russian Life since Ancient Times]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990, 526 p. (In Russian).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献