Affiliation:
1. Academy for Medical Education, Medical School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Abstract
Introduction: A series of workshops was held early in our MD curriculum redesign with two aims: gaining stakeholder input to curriculum direction and design; engaging colleagues in the curriculum development process.
Methods: Workshops format included rationale for change and small-group discussions on three questions: (1) Future challenges in healthcare? (2) our current strengths? (3) Future graduate attributes? Small-group discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed and fieldnotes kept and thematically analysed. We conducted a literature review looking at best practice and exemplar medical programs globally.
Results: Forty-seven workshops were held across 17 sites with more than 1000 people participating and 100 written submissions received. Analysis showed alignment between data from workshops, written submissions and the literature review.
The commitment of our medical community to the education of future doctors and to healthcare was universally evident.
Six roles of a well-rounded doctor emerged from the data: (1) Safe and effective clinicians – clinically capable, person-centered with sound clinical judgement; (2) Critical thinkers, scientists and scholars with a thorough understanding of the social and scientific basis of medicine, to support clinical decision making; (3) Kind and compassionate professionals – sensitive, responsive, communicate clearly and act with integrity; (4) Partners and team players who collaborate effectively and show leadership in clinical care, education and research; (5) Dynamic learners and educators – adaptable and committed to lifelong learning; and (6) Advocates for health improvement – able to positively and responsibly impact the health of individuals, communities and populations
Conclusion: Deliberate stakeholder engagement implemented from the start of a major medical curriculum renewal is helpful in facilitating change management.
Publisher
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine
Subject
Health Professions (miscellaneous),Education,Reviews and References (medical),Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference4 articles.
1. Australian Medical Council (AMC). (2012). Standards for assessment and accreditation of primary medical programs by the Australian Medical Council 2012. Australian Medical Council Ltd.
2. Prideaux, D. (2003). ABC of teaching and learning in medicine: Curriculum design. BMJ, 326(7381), 268-270. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7383.268
3. Torralba, K. M. D., & Katz, J. D. (2020). Quality of medical care begins with quality of medical education. Clinical Rheumatology, 39, 617-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-019-04902-w
4. Velthuis, F., Varpio, L., Helmich, E., Dekker, H., & Jaarsma, A. D. C. (2018). Navigating the complexities of undergraduate medical curriculum change: change leaders’ perspectives. Academic Medicine, 93(10), 1503-1510. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002165
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献