Author:
Brand Ulrich,Dietz Kristina,Lang Miriam
Abstract
The aim of this text is to make sense of the emerging political-institutional, territorial, and socio-ecological dynamics and contradictions of neo-extractivism in Latin America in the context of global capitalist development. In contrast to some existing literature, we argue that the term ‘neo-extractivism’ should not be restricted to countries with progressive governments but be applied to all Latin American societies that, since the 1970s and especially since the year 2000, depend predominantly on the exploitation and exportation of nature. We argue that the often vague usage of the term neo-extractivism can be strengthened when it is seen in line with dominant development models. Therefore we refer to regulation theory and its historical heuristic of different phases of capitalist development. This enables us to look at the temporal-spatial interdependencies between shifting socio-economic and technological developments, world market structures, and political-institutional configurations that characterize neo-extractivism across scales and beyond national borders.
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Reference58 articles.
1. Extractivism and neoextractivism: two sides of the same curse.;Acosta,2013
2. Aglietta, Michel (1979): A Theory of Capitalist Regulation. The US Experience. London: Verso.
3. Space, Regulation and the Periodization of Capitalism
4. La transición al socialismo de la Revolución Bolivariana.;Álvarez,2013
5. Altvater, Elmar (1987): Sachzwang Weltmarkt. Hamburg: VSA.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献