Abstract
This study evaluates the impact of agricultural credit on productivity of Musaceae (banana and plantain) in farmers from Valle del Cauca (Colombia) using data from National Agricultural Census of 2014. Additionally, the effect of credit on two productivity indices (PI1 y PI2) was evaluated, PI1 measured in tons of production per hectare and PI2 in ton of production per employee. To evaluate this impact, the counterfactual without treatment was estimated using the information of those farmers who obtained a credit and similar farmers who did not. Therefore, to control the selection bias, derived from the fact that the credits are not awarded randomly, this study uses the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) methodology applying the 4-nearest neighbor matching algorithm. In general, for banana producers, the results suggest that access to agricultural credit has positive and significant effects with an increase in productivity per hectare (PI1) of 8.4%; on the other hand, for PI2 the result was not statistically significant, however, it may be an indicator that the farmer is not using human resources efficiently to achieve the increase obtained in PI1 . Finally, this study suggests that access to agricultural credit may not be decisive in increasing the productivity of the plantain crop, given that the effect on the two indices evaluated was indeterminate.
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Subject
Horticulture,Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology,Food Science,Forestry
Reference28 articles.
1. Ciaian P, Fałkowski J and Kancs d’Artis. 2012. Access to credit, factor allocation and farm productivity: Evidence from the CEE transition economies. Agricultural Finance Review 72(1): 22-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/00021461211222114
2. Chandio AA, Jiang Y, Gessesse AT and Dunya R. 2019. The nexus of agricultural credit, farm size and technical efficiency in Sindh, Pakistan: A stochastic production frontier approach. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 18(3): 348–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2017.11.001
3. Deininger K, Castagnini R and González MA. 2013. Reforma agraria y mercados de tierra en Colombia: los impactos en la equidad y eficiencia. Planeación y Desarrollo 34(2): 213–247. https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/RevistaPD/2003/pd_vXXXIV_n2_2003_art.4.pdf
4. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística – DANE. 2015. Censo nacional agropecuario. Décima entrega resultados 2014- cifras preliminares. Tercer Censo Nacional Agropecuario, 74 p.; accessed: October 2021. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/CensoAgropecuario/avanceCNA/Boletin%20tecnico-6Nov.pdf
5. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística – DANE. 2017. Tercer censo nacional agropecuario. Archivo Nacional de Datos, accessed: October 2021. http://microdatos.dane.gov.co/index.php/catalog/513/get_microdata
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献