Abstract
Interaction in foreign language classrooms has been regarded as a key factor in enhancing learning outcomes (Allwright, 1984; Ginting, 2017; Hanum, 2016). This study examined interactions in a specific university classroom context in Thailand where 28 Chinese students were learning Thai as a foreign language with a Thai teacher. It employed a mix-method design. Quantitative data were gathered based on a modified Flanders’ model (Flanders Interaction Analysis Category System or FIACS), and the qualitative data were gathered from classroom observations. The analysis of 90-minute video records and field notes from the observations of three classes reveal the domination of teacher’s talk (77.59%), and the minimal students’ talk (6.16%). Besides, silence time occupies 16.25%. Out of the total of 22 categories of interaction, no student talk can be categorized as an initiation of talk, and no teacher talk can be categorized as procedural lectures and assigning homework. Characteristics of the interaction varied according to the quantity and categories of talk. Transcription of verbatim from the videos reveals details of the interaction. Findings suggest that quantity, category, and characteristics of talk are interrelated and must all be improved together to increase the quality of interaction to affect student learning outcomes.
Publisher
Asia Association of Computer Assisted Language Learning
Reference85 articles.
1. Adaba, H.W. (2017). Exploring the practice of teacher-student classroom interaction in EFL to develop the learner’s speaking skills in Tullu Sangota primary school grade eight students in focus. Art and Social Science Journal, 8(4), 1-18. DOI: 10.4172/2151-6200.1000295.
2. Abebe, D., & Deneke, D. (2015). Causes of students’ limited participation in EFL classroom: Ethiopian public universities in focus. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 74-89.
3. Almohizea, N. I. (2018). An investigation of oral interaction in English as a foreign language classroom. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 6(3), 51-60. DOI:10.11648/j.ijll.20180603.11
4. Allwright, R. L. (1984). The importance of interaction in classroom language learning. Applied linguistics, 5(2), 156-171. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.2.156
5. Amatari, V. O. (2015). The instructional process: a review of Flanders’ interaction analysis in a classroom setting. International Journal of Secondary Education, 3(5), 43-49. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150305.11
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献