Abstract
This experiment aimed to compare the growth performance, digestive efficiency and health status of three paternal lines for growing rabbits. The R line was selected by growth rate during the growing period for 37 generations; the RF line was founded by selecting a population of elite R animals (average daily gain>60 g/d); and the RFLP line was founded by backcrossing males from the RF line with females from the LP maternal line. A total of 387 weaned rabbits were used to evaluate growing performance from weaning until 63 d of age in individual cages, in three batches. Additionally, 33 animals were used to determine nutrient digestive efficiency in a digestibility trial. Body weight and feed intake were controlled at weaning (28 d), 46 and 63 d of age. Mortality and morbidity were also monitored daily. During the digestibility trial, feed intake and faeces excretion were controlled daily. Results showed no significant effects of genetic type on body weight, daily feed intake and feed conversion ratio throughout the experiment. However, RF animals had a higher average daily gain from 28 to 46 d of age (+4.4%; P<0.05) compared with R animals, but lower from 46 to 63 d of age (–4.3%; P<0.05). Regarding digestive efficiency, RF and RFLP lines showed slightly higher faecal digestibility for dry matter and gross energy of the diet compared with the R line (+1.3 percentage points; P<0.05). Mortality was higher in animals from R and RF lines compared with RFLP (on av. 25.40 vs. 14.06%; P<0.05). Our results suggest that the RFLP genetic line could be a suitable alternative to the R line, as it shows a similar growth performance but a lower incidence of digestive disorders.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Generalitat Valenciana
Conselleria de Innovación, Universidades, Ciencia y Sociedad Digital, Generalitat Valenciana
Publisher
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology
Reference32 articles.
1. AOAC 2002. Official methods of analysis, 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
2. Arnau-Bonachera A., Savietto D., Pascual J.J. 2018. Long-term implications of feed energy source in different genetic types of reproductive rabbit females: III. Fitness and productivity. Animal, 12: 1886-1894. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003305
3. Baselga M. 2004. Genetic improvement of meat rabbits. Programmes and diffusion. In Proc.:8th World Rabbit Congress, 7-10 September 2004, Puebla, Mexico, 1-13.
4. Blasco A., Nagy I., Hernández P. 2018. Genetics of growth, carcass and meat quality in rabbits. Meat Sci., 145: 178-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.06.030
5. Bennegadi N., Gidenne T., Licois D. 2000. Non-specific enteritis in the growing rabbit: detailed description and incidence according to fibre deficiency and sanitary status. In Proc.: 7th World Rabbit Congress, 4-7 July 2000, Valencia, Spain, Vol. A: 109-117.