Abstract
The initial construction of a digital virtual object is the three-dimensional (3D)point. Using the notions of making, wayfaring, meshwork and agency, this discussion focuses on Ingold’s (2011) theoretical approach to these comments as a means for the construction of archaeological knowledge as applied to the 3D virtual landscape. It will demonstrate that 3D points, whether constructed or captured, can be considered to be agents within an actor network, have agency and are subject to memory and loss within the digital archaeological record. By their interconnections they become a mesh work that can exchange and retain unique attributes of materiality. As such, they challenge our notions of meaning-making beyond the rote actions of visualizing within archaeology to a form that is more theoretically deeper. By viewing the construction and capture and the production of 3D or 2D visual data through a different lens but within theoretical archaeological terms, we can begin to understand our role in the creation of meaning within virtual archaeology.
Publisher
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Archeology,Archeology,Conservation
Reference21 articles.
1. Additive archaeology: the spirit of virtual archaeology reprinted.;Beale,2015
2. Belozerskaya, M. (2009).To Wake the Dead: A Renaissance Merchant and the Birth of Archaeology. New York: W.W.Norton & Company, Inc.
3. The London Charter and the Seville Principles as sources of requirements for e-archaeology systems development purposes
4. A new introduction to the London Charter.;Denard,2012
5. Cyber-Archaeology: Notes on the simulation of the past
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献