Figurations of Digital Practice, Craft, and Agency in Two Mediterranean Fieldwork Projects

Author:

Batist Zachary1ORCID,Masters Val1ORCID,Torma Tiffany C.1ORCID,Carter Michael2ORCID,Ferris Neal3,Huvila Isto4,Ross Seamus1ORCID,Dallas Costis1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Information, University of Toronto, Toronto , M5S 3G6 , Ontario , Canada

2. Faculty of Communication and Design, Ryerson University, Toronto , M5B 2K3 , Ontario , Canada

3. Department of Anthropology, Western University/Museum of Ontario Archaeology, London , N6A 5C2 , Ontario , Canada

4. Department of ALM, Uppsala University , Uppsala , 75126 , Sweden

Abstract

AbstractArchaeological practice is increasingly enacted within pervasive and invisible digital infrastructures, tools, and services that affect how participants engage in learning and fieldwork, and how evidence, knowledge, and expertise are produced. This article discusses the collective imaginings regarding the present and future of digital archaeological practice held by researchers working in two archaeological projects in the Eastern Mediterranean, who have normalized the use of digital tools and the adoption of digital processes in their studies. It is a part of E-CURATORS, a research project investigating how archaeologists in multiple contexts and settings incorporate pervasive digital technologies in their studies. Based on an analysis of qualitative interviews, we interpret the arguments advanced by study participants on aspects of digital work, learning, and expertise. We find that, in their sayings, participants not only characterize digital tools and workflows as having positive instrumental value, but also recognize that they may severely constrain the autonomy and agency of researchers as knowledge workers through the hyper-granularization of data, the erosion of expertise, and the mechanization of work. Participants advance a notion of digital archaeology based on do-it-yourself (DIY) practice and craft to reclaim agency from the algorithmic power of digital technology and to establish fluid, positional distribution of roles and agency, and mutual validation of expertise. Operating within discourses of labour vs efficiency, and technocracy vs agency, sayings, elicited within the archaeological situated practice in the wild, become doings, echoing archaeology’s anxiety in the face of pervasive digital technology.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Education,Archeology,Conservation

Reference131 articles.

1. Alexander, C. , Ishikawa, S. , Silverstein, M. , Jacobson, M. , King, I. F. , & Angel, S. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Beale, G. , & Reilly, P. (2017). Digital practice as meaning making in archaeology. Internet Archaeology, 44. 10.11141/ia.44.13.

3. Benardou, A. , Champion, E. , Dallas, C. , & Hughes, L. M. (Eds.). (2018). Cultural heritage infrastructures in digital humanities (1st ed.). London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315575278.

4. Benardou, A. , Constantopoulos, P. , Dallas, C. , & Gavrilis, D. (2010). A conceptual model for scholarly research activity. In J. Unsworth , H. Rosenbaum , & K. E. Fisher (Eds.), IConference 2010: The fifth annual iConference (pp. 26–32). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois. http://nora.lis.uiuc.edu/images/iConferences/2010papers_Allen-Ortiz.pdf.

5. Berggren, Å. , & Hodder, I. (2003). Social practice, method, and some problems of field archaeology. American Antiquity, 68(3), 421–434. 10.2307/3557102.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3