Abstract
AbstractThe contemporary period is characterized by intense scholarly, legal and socio-political debates about the conceptual framework, which ought to guide state responses to unmitigated violence resulting from protracted armed conflicts across the globe. The prevalence of military interventionist discourse in the media and governmental organizations necessitates further reflection on the international community’s legal obligations not only with respect to putting an end to violence, but holding aggressors of armed perpetrations individually accountable for political unrest, economic destabilization and loss of life as well as responsible for the reestablishment of social and political order on the ground, which are to ensure human security in the process of post-conflict nation-building. The analysis of two recent conflicts in Kosovo and Iraq will provide a critical foundation for the examination of international bodies’ and state actors’, such as the United Nations (in the case of Kosovo) and of the United States (in the case of Iraq), implementation of legal mechanisms by which the
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference64 articles.
1. The Pre-War Reconstruction of Post-War-Iraq;Third World Quarterly,2003
2. Post-Saddam Iraq: Deconstructing a Regime, Reconstructing a Nation;Third World Quarterly,2005
3. Porcupines in Love: The Intricate Convergence of Human Rights and Human Security;European Human Rights Law Review,2005
4. The Metaethical Paradox of Just War Theory;Ethical Theory and Moral Practice,2001
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献