Abstract
To attain peace after state-on-state war, there must be a belligerent occupation to establish control and security of a defeated state—but that is not enough. There is the concept of jus post bellum concerning the vanquished, which is critically necessary in practice, yet insufficiently developed and understood. Providing the history and tentatively trying to determine the elements that are contained in this concept are the present article’s purpose. Tracing the concept from the earliest Christian writers to the more secular present-day authors will aid in the prospective application of jus post bellum. Scholars, military officers, statesmen, religious leaders, and humanitarians need to understand and accept the basic elements of the concept. A clear understanding of the largely religious history behind these elements should assist in their acceptance and future practical application, once these are agreed upon.
Reference58 articles.
1. Growing Edges of Just War Theory: Jus ante bellum, jus post bellum, and Imperfect Justice
2. The Summa Theologica. The Second Part of the Second Part;Aquinas,1981
3. Concerning the City of God against the Pagans,1972
4. Jus Post Bellum
5. Legal Environment;Beatty,2014
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Jus post bellum: Scope and assessment of the applicable legal framework;International Review of the Red Cross;2024-05-20
2. Aeschylus'sPersiansand the “Just War”;A Companion to Aeschylus;2023-03-15
3. Justice After War In Just War Tradition (Jus Post Bellum);Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi;2022-08-07