Affiliation:
1. The Bucharest University of Economic Studies , Bucharest , Romania
Abstract
Abstract
The present study focuses on a new approach in the process of developing personal work styles, based on the usefulness of 360 degree feedback, taking into consideration the following dimensions: work-life balance, gender-age, self-development and the behavior a person has, following the process of self-development and defining work style. Using different approaches, the study attempts to identify if there are some differences between the evaluations received from the family and the ones from the work environment. All these factors aim at improving personal, but also organizational performances. Based on the current body of the literature, a discussion is made and conclusions are presented.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference19 articles.
1. Adizes, I., Cudanov, M., Rodic, D. (2017). Timing of Proactive Organizational Consulting: Difference between Organizational Perception and Behaviour. Amfiteatru Economic, 19(44), 232-248.
2. Bear, J.B., Cushenbery, L., London, M., Sherman, G.D. (2017). Performance feedback, power retention, and the gender gap in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.003.
3. Campbell, D.J. (2000). The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 52-66. doi: 10.5465/AME.2000.4468066.
4. Chandra, A. (2006). Employee Evaluation Strategies for Healthcare Organizations – A general guide. Research and Perspective on Healthcare, 8(2), 34-38. doi: 10.3200/HTPS.84.2.34-38.
5. Cleveland, J.N., Landy, F. J. (1981). The influence of rater and ratee age on two performance judgments. Personnel Psychology, 34(1), 19-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1981.tb02173.x.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献