Affiliation:
1. The Bucharest University of Economic Studies , Bucharest , Romania ; Academy of Romanian Scientists , Bucharest , Romania
Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to present a structural analysis of strategic thinking spectrum in turbulent times. Business excellence cannot be achieved without a well-defined strategic thinking spectrum able to elaborate and implement strategies in a fast changeable and unpredictable business environment. Strategic thinking means to think for a desirable future which can be ahead 4-5 years of the present time and to make decisions to the best of our knowledge for that unknown business environment. Thus, the research question is: How can we conceive the spectrum of strategic thinking such that we shall be able to deal with a complex and unknown future in achieving a competitive advantage? The methodology used to answer this question is based on metaphorical thinking, and multidimensional analysis. I shall consider four main dimensions: time, complexity, uncertainty, and novelty. On each of these dimensions I shall analyze the known thinking models and their attributes with respect to request formulated in the research question. Then, I shall choose those thinking models that correspond to the future characteristics and integrate them in a continuous spectrum. On each dimension I shall consider three basic thinking models. On the time dimension they are: inertial, dynamic and entropic thinking. On the complexity dimension they are: linear, nonlinear and systemic thinking. On the uncertainty dimension they are: deterministic, probabilistic and chaotic thinking. Finally, on the novelty dimension we have: template, intelligent and creative thinking. Considering all requirements for the unknown future, we conclude that strategic thinking spectrum should contain: entropic, nonlinear and systemic, probabilistic and chaotic, intelligent and creative thinking models. Such a spectrum increases the capacity of our understanding and as a consequence it enhances the capability of making adequate decisions in conditions of complexity and uncertainty.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference32 articles.
1. Atkins, P. (2010). The laws of thermodynamics: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Bird, R.J. (2003). Chaos and life: Complexity and order in evolution and thought. Columbia University Press, New York.
3. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1-28.
4. Bratianu, C. (2007). Thinking patterns and knowledge dynamics. In Remenyi, D. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Consorci Escola Industrial, Barcelona, Spain, 6-7 September 2007, pp. 152-156.
5. Bratianu, C. (2009). The frontier of linearity in the intellectual capital metaphor. In Stam, C. (Ed.). Proceedings of the European Conference on Intellectual Capital, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Haarlem, Netherlands, 28-29 April 2009, pp. 97-103.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献