Author:
Dahlweid Fried-Michael,Kämpf Matthias,Leichtle Alexander
Abstract
Abstract
Laboratory data is a treasure chest for personalized medicine: it is – in general – electronically available, highly structured, quality controlled and indicative for many diseases. However, it is also a box with (probably more than) seven locks: laboratories use their own internal coding systems, results are reported in different languages (four official languages plus English with very distinct features in Switzerland), report formats are not uniform, standard nomenclature (e.g. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes [LOINC]) is not routinely used and even these coding systems lack important information, including data, for example, about the specific “kit” used for testing or preanalytical procedures affecting the sample quality and result interpretability. Visualization of complex laboratory and reporting “-omics” data are additional challenges. Currently, there is no “passepartout” key for all these locks available, and also newer concepts such as Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR) might not provide enough plasticity to unconditionally render laboratory data interoperable. In this short overview, we present current approaches in Switzerland with a specific focus on the exemplary Bernese implementations.
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Medical Laboratory Technology,Clinical Biochemistry
Reference23 articles.
1. The Research Data Management Platform (RDMP): a novel, process driven, open-source tool for the management of longitudinal cohorts of clinical data;GigaScience,2018
2. Digital health: a science at crossroads;Int J Med Inform,2018
3. How do we use the data from pre-analytical quality indicators and how should we?;J Lab Precis Med,2018
4. Der Referenzbereich ist tot – es lebe der Reference Change Value;Ther Umsch,2015
5. Standard PREanalytical code version 3.0;Biopreserv Biobank,2018
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献