Measurement of anti SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG in saliva: validation of a highly sensitive assay and effects of the sampling collection method and correction by protein
Author:
Martínez-Subiela Silvia1ORCID, Franco-Martínez Lorena1, Rubio Camila P.1ORCID, Muñoz-Prieto Alberto1, Torres-Cantero Alberto2, Tecles Fernando1, Sánchez-Resalt Cristina1, Cerón José J.1, Tvarijonaviciute Asta1
Affiliation:
1. Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis, Interlab-UMU, Regional Campus of International Excellence ‘Campus Mare Nostrum’ , University of Murcia , Murcia , Spain 2. Preventive Medicine , Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB, Universidad de Murcia , Murcia , Spain
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To develop and evaluate a new highly sensitive assay to detect IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD in saliva samples.
Methods
A two-step sandwich type immunoassay based on the amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous technology was developed and an analytical validation was performed. As a part of this validation, the influence of factors, such as different sampling conditions (stimulated saliva and passive drool) and the correction of values by total protein content, in the ability of saliva to detect increases in antibodies after an immune stimulus and be an alternative to serum, was evaluated. For this purpose, paired samples of saliva and serum at different times after vaccination were used.
Results
Saliva concentrations were lower than serum, but both fluids showed similar kinetics, with higher correlations when saliva was obtained by passive flow and the results were not corrected by protein.
Conclusions
The developed method showed a good analytical performance and can properly measure antibody concentrations in saliva of vaccinated individuals. However, saliva could have a lower sensitivity compared to serum at initial stages of the immune response and also when the antibody response decreased after a stimulus.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference28 articles.
1. Franco-Martínez, L, Castillo-Felipe, C. Saliva as a non-invasive sample: pros and cons. In: Tvarijonaviciute, A, Martínez-Subiela, S, López-Jornet, P, Lamy, E, editors. Saliva in health and disease. Cham: Springer; 2020. 2. Ceron, JJ, Lamy, E, Martinez-Subiela, S, Lopez-Jornet, P, Silva, FCE, Eckersall, PD, et al.. Use of saliva for diagnosis and monitoring the SARS-CoV-2: a general perspective. J Clin Med 2020;9:1491. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051491. 3. Mulligan, MJ, Lyke, KE, Kitchin, N, Absalon, J, Gurtman, A, Lockhart, S, et al.. Phase I/II study of COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults. Nature 2020;586:589–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2639-4. 4. Padoan, A, Dall’Olmo, L, Rocca, FD, Barbaro, F, Cosma, C, Basso, D, et al.. Antibody response to first and second dose of BNT162b2 in a cohort of characterized healthcare workers. Clin Chim Acta 2021;519:60–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2021.04.006. 5. Ketas, TJ, Chaturbhuj, D, Cruz Portillo, VM, Francomano, E, Golden, E, Chandrasekhar, S, et al.. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines are detectable in saliva. Pathog Immun 2021;6:116–34. https://doi.org/10.20411/pai.v6i1.441.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|