Add-on testing: stability assessment of 63 biochemical analytes in centrifuged and capped samples stored at 16 °C
Author:
Nielsen Anne J.12, Ladefoged Søren A.12, Madsen Jeppe B.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Clinical Biochemistry , 11297 Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark 2. Department of Clinical Medicine , Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Integration of add-on testing in high-scale automated clinical laboratories constitute a valuable instrument not only for the clinicians and the general patient care, but also for the laboratory itself. Knowledge on sample quality and analytical stability upon storage is necessary to be able to offer add-on testing. The objectives of this study were to examine the analytical stability of 63 biochemical analytes in plasma and urine samples stored at 16 °C.
Methods
Samples were collected by professional laboratory technicians, analyzed at automated analyzers and stored in their primary, capped tube without separator for 10, 12, 16, 20 or 24 h at 16 °C. Stability was assessed by inspecting mean concentration of samples at baseline and examining if (A) mean concentration over time violated limits of bias, or if (B) individual sample concentrations violated limits of total error.
Results
The majority of the 63 analytes were stable for up to 24 h of storage. Few of the analytes were only suitable for add-on testing for 4, 6, 10, 12, 16 or 20 h of storage. One analyte, P-lactate dehydrogenase, was not found suitable for add-on testing when stored at 16 °C.
Conclusions
Due to the increasing number of intelligent solutions for high-scale clinical laboratories, add-on testing has come to stay. Loss of stability could not be demonstrated for the majority of analytes after 10, 12, 16, 20 or 24 h of storage. This feature of analytical stability suggests that add-on testing is an acceptable tool for these analytes.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference39 articles.
1. Guder, WG, da Fonseca-Wollheim, F, Heil, W, Schmitt, Y, Töpfer, G, Wisser, H, et al.. Quality of diagnostic samples, 3rd completely revised edition ed Oxford: BD Diagnostics; 2010. 2. Sciacovelli, L, Aita, A, Padoan, A, Pelloso, M, Antonelli, G, Piva, E, et al.. Performance criteria and quality indicators for the post-analytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1169–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0897. 3. Gomez-Rioja, R, Meyer, AV, Cornes, M, Costelloe, S, Vermeersch, P, Simundic, A-M, et al.. Recommendation for the design of stability studies on clinical specimens. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:1708–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0221. 4. Åsberg KBS, A, Mikkelsen, G. Prøvematerialets holdbarhet – kriterier og vurderinger. Klinisk Biokemi i Norden 2011;23:34–8. 5. Hedayati, M, Razavi, SA, Boroomand, S, Kheradmand Kia, S. The impact of pre-analytical variations on biochemical analytes stability: a systematic review. J Clin Lab Anal 2020;34:e23551. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23551.
|
|