Hyris bCUBE SARS-CoV-2 rapid molecular saliva testing: a POCT innovation on its way
Author:
Padoan Andrea12ORCID, Cosma Chiara2, Aita Ada2, Navaglia Filippo2, Basso Daniela12, Giannella Gianfranco3, Plebani Mario12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Medicine-DIMED , University of Padova , Padova , Italy 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine , University-Hospital of Padova , Padova , Italy 3. Hyris Ltd , London , UK
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The reliable identification of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection is the cornerstone for containing viral spread. Rapid molecular point-of-care testing (POCT) of saliva might reduce analysis time, thus increasing the efficacy of contact tracing. In this study, a new POCT RT-PCR assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in saliva was evaluated and compared with an already validated CE-IVD method.
Methods
An evaluation was made of 160 left-over salivary samples (27 frozen, kept at −80 °C and 133 fresh), collected using Salivette (Sarstedt, Germany). Samples were analyzed by TaqPath COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR kit, QuantStudio5 Real-Time (Applied Biosystems, USA) (TaqPath) and bKIT Virus Finder COVID-19 Saliva (Hyris Global Diagnostics, Italy). Performances of three- and fivefold pooling strategies were also evaluated. Blood assay interference in saliva was also tested with Hyris.
Results
On using TaqPath, SARS-CoV-2 positivity was detected in 35 samples. Another 10 positive samples were artificially-generated by blind mixing of positive with negative samples. Hyris positive and negative percentages of agreement were 97.6 (95% CI: 87.2–99.9%) and 100 (95% CI: 97.0–100%), respectively. Seventeen positive pools, evaluated for threefold strategy, were all correctly determined by both systems. For the 5-pool strategy, 94.7% (18/19) of samples resulted positive with the Hyris system, and 100% with TaqPath. The presence of 1% of blood (v/v) in saliva did not interfere with the accuracy of Hyris assay.
Conclusions
The sensitivity and specificity of the bKIT Virus Finder COVID-19 Saliva were optimal with respect to TaqPath. In view of the safe and straightforward pre-analytical procedure involved, and the small size of the Hyris bCube, the Hyris system can be used for POCT.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference18 articles.
1. Zhou, Y, Jiang, H, Wang, Q, Yang, M, Chen, Y, Jiang, Q. Use of contact tracing, isolation, and mass testing to control transmission of covid-19 in China. BMJ 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2330 [Epub ahead of print]. 2. Gray, N, Calleja, D, Wimbush, A, Miralles-Dolz, E, Gray, A, De Angelis, M, et al.. Is “no test is better than a bad test”? Impact of diagnostic uncertainty in mass testing on the spread of COVID-19. PLoS One 2020;15:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240775. 3. Dinnes, J, Deeks, JJ, Berhane, S, Taylor, M, Adriano, A, Davenport, C, et al.. Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;3:CD013705. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub2. 4. Kahn, M, Schuierer, L, Bartenschlager, C, Zellmer, S, Frey, R, Freitag, M, et al.. Performance of antigen testing for diagnosis of COVID-19: a direct comparison of a lateral flow device to nucleic acid amplification based tests. BMC Infect Dis 2021;21:798. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06524-7. 5. Sakthivel, D, Delgado-Diaz, D, McArthur, L, Hopper, W, Richards, JS, Narh, CA. Point-of-Care diagnostic tools for surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Front Public Health 2021;9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.766871.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|