Searching for the urine osmolality surrogate: an automated machine learning approach
Author:
Topcu Deniz İlhan1ORCID, Bayraktar Nilüfer1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Medical Biochemistry , Başkent University Faculty of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Automated machine learning (AutoML) tools can help clinical laboratory professionals to develop machine learning models. The objective of this study was to develop a novel formula for the estimation of urine osmolality using an AutoML tool and to determine the efficiency of AutoML tools in a clinical laboratory setting.
Methods
Three hundred routine urinalysis samples were used for reference osmolality and urine clinical chemistry analysis. The H2O AutoML engine completed the machine learning development steps with minimum human intervention. Four feature groups were created, which include different urinalysis measurements according to the Boruta feature selection algorithm. Method comparison statistics including Spearman’s correlation, Passing–Bablok regression analysis were performed, and Bland Altman plots were created to compare model predictions with the reference method. The minimum allowable bias (24.17%) from biological variation data was used as the limit of agreement.
Results
The AutoML engine developed a total of 183 ML models. Conductivity and specific gravity had the highest variable importance. Models that include conductivity, specific gravity, and other urinalysis parameters had the highest R2 (0.70–0.83), and 70–84% of results were within the limit of agreement.
Conclusions
Combining urinary conductivity with other urinalysis parameters using validated machine learning models can yield a promising surrogate. Additionally, AutoML tools facilitate the machine learning development cycle and should be considered for developing ML models in clinical laboratories.
Funder
Sysmex Turkey, Baskent University
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference22 articles.
1. De Jesús Vidal-Mayo, J, Olivas-Martínez, A, Pérez-Díaz, I, López-Navarro, JM, Sánchez-Landa, E, Carrillo-Maravilla, E, et al.. Calculated versus measured urine osmolarity: accuracy of estimated urine density. Rev Investig Clin 2018;70:310–8. https://doi.org/10.24875/ric.18002598. 2. Wright, AE, Wragg, R, Lopes, J, Robb, A, McCarthy, L. Prediction of need for intervention in posterior urethral valves: use of urine osmolality. J Pediatr Surg 2018;53:316–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.026. 3. Kavouras, SA, Suh, H-G, Vallet, M, Daudon, M, Mauromoustakos, A, Vecchio, M, et al.. Urine osmolality predicts calcium-oxalate crystallization risk in patients with recurrent urolithiasis. Urolithiasis 2021;49:399–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-020-01242-2. 4. Lee, MJ, Chang, TI, Lee, J, Kim, YH, Oh, KH, Lee, SW, et al.. Urine osmolality and renal outcome in patients with chronic kidney disease: results from the KNOW-ckd. Kidney Blood Press Res 2019;44:1089–100. https://doi.org/10.1159/000502291. 5. Youhanna, S, Bankir, L, Jungers, P, Porteous, D, Polasek, O, Bochud, M, et al.. Validation of surrogates of urine osmolality in population studies. Am J Nephrol 2017;46:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1159/000475769.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|