A systematic evaluation of stool DNA preparation protocols for colorectal cancer screening via analysis of DNA methylation biomarkers
Author:
Jin Shengnan12, Ye Qian12, Hong Yanping12, Dai Wenqing12, Zhang Chengliang12, Liu Weihao12, Guo Ying12, Zhu Dewen12, Zhang Zhengzheng12, Chen Shiliang12, Wang Yourong12, Li Dandan12, Ma Wen12, Yang Zhengquan12, Li Jinlei3, Zheng Zhihai3, Luan Ju124, Wu Xiaoli5, Jiang Feizhao3, Xu Chang3, Ding Chunming12
Affiliation:
1. School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Sciences , Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , Zhejiang , PR China 2. Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Ministry of Education , Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , Zhejiang , PR China 3. Department of Colorectal Surgery , The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , Zhejiang , PR China 4. Innovation Biomedical Co., Ltd. , Wenzhou , Zhejiang , PR China 5. Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , Zhejiang , PR China ;
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using stool samples is now in routine use where tumor DNA methylation analysis for leading markers such as NDRG4 and SDC2 is an integral part of the test. However, processing stool samples for reproducible and efficient extraction of human genomic DNA remains a bottleneck for further research into better biomarkers and assays.
Methods
We systematically evaluated several factors involved in the processing of stool samples and extraction of DNA. These factors include: stool processing (solid and homogenized samples), preparation of DNA from supernatant and pellets, and DNA extraction with column and magnetic beads-based methods. Furthermore, SDC2 and NDRG4 methylation levels were used to evaluate the clinical performance of the optimal protocol.
Results
The yield of total and human genomic DNA (hgDNA) was not reproducible when solid stool scraping is used, possibly due to sampling variations. More reproducible results were obtained from homogenized stool samples. Magnetic beads-based DNA extraction using the supernatant from the homogenized stool was chosen for further analysis due to better reproducibility, higher hgDNA yield, lower non-hgDNA background, and the potential for automation. With this protocol, a combination of SDC2 and NDRG4 methylation signals with a linear regression model achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 81.82 and 93.75%, respectively.
Conclusions
Through the systematic evaluation of different stool processing and DNA extraction methods, we established a reproducible protocol for analyzing tumor DNA methylation markers in stool samples for colorectal cancer screening.
Funder
National Natural Sciences Foundation of China Medical Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Provincial Health Commission Wenzhou Science and Technology Bureau High-Level Innovation Team of Universities in Zhejiang Province Innovation Discipline of Zhejiang Province in Nucleic Acid Molecular Diagnostics Key Discipline of Zhejiang Province in Medical Technology
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference31 articles.
1. Siegel, RL, Miller, KD, Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70:7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590. 2. Chen, W, Zheng, R, Baade, PD, Zhang, S, Zeng, H, Bray, F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:115–32. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21338. 3. Adler, A, Geiger, S, Keil, A, Bias, H, Schatz, P, deVos, T, et al. Improving compliance to colorectal cancer screening using blood and stool based tests in patients refusing screening colonoscopy in Germany. BMC Gastroenterol 2014;14:183. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230x-14-183. 4. Kahi, CJ, Imperiale, TF, Juliar, BE, Rex, DK. Effect of screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:770–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.030. 5. Osborn, NK, Ahlquist, DA. Stool screening for colorectal cancer: molecular approaches. Gastroenterology 2005;128:192–206. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.10.041.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|