Effects of deep brain stimulation and verbal suggestions on pain in Parkinson’s disease

Author:

Rosenkjær Sophie1,Hvingelby Victor Schwartz2,Johnsen Erik Lisbjerg34,Møller Mette3,Carlino Elisa5,Jensen Troels Staehelin64,Vase Lene1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark

2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark

3. Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark

4. Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark

5. Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin , Turin , Italy

6. Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Pain Research Centre, Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Background and objectives In Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, verbal suggestions have been shown to modulate motor and clinical outcomes in treatment with subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS). Furthermore, DBS may alleviate pain in PD. However, it is unknown if verbal suggestions influence DBS’ effects on pain. Methods Twenty-four people with PD and DBS had stimulation downregulated (80–60 to 20%) and upregulated (from 20–60 to 80%) in a blinded manner on randomized test days: (1) with negative and positive suggestions of pain for down- and upregulation, respectively, and (2) with no suggestions to effect (control). Effects of DBS and verbal suggestions were assessed on ongoing and evoked pain (hypertonic saline injections) via 0–10 numerical rating scales along with motor symptoms, expectations, and blinding. Results Stimulation did not influence ongoing and evoked pain but influenced motor symptoms in the expected direction. Baseline and experimental pain measures showed no patterns in degree of pain. There was a trend toward negative suggestions increasing pain and positive suggestions decreasing pain. Results show significant differences in identical stimulation with negative vs positive suggestions (60% conditions AUC 38.75 vs 23.32, t(13) = 3.10, p < 0.001). Expectations to pain had small to moderate effects on evoked pain. Patients estimated stimulation level correctly within 10 points Conclusion Stimulation does not seem to influence ongoing and evoked pain, but verbal suggestions may influence pain levels. Patients appear to be unblinded to stimulation level which is an important consideration for future studies testing DBS in an attempted blind fashion.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3