Talking with tradition: On Brandom’s historical rationality

Author:

Gazit Yael1

Affiliation:

1. The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, School of Philosophy, Linguistics and Science Studies , Tel Aviv University , Israel

Abstract

Abstract Robert Brandom’s notion of historical rationality seeks to supplement his inferentialism thesis by providing an account for the validity of conceptual contents. This account, in the shape of a historical process, involves the same self-integration of Brandom’s earlier inferentialism and is similarly restricted by reciprocal recognition of others. This article argues that in applying the synchronic social model of normative discourse to the diachronic axis of engaging the past, Brandom premises a false analogy between present community and past tradition, which obscures the important differences between the two axes. This is explored by looking closely at how Brandom’s own engagements with the past exemplify his historical rationality. Taking its cue from Brandom’s critics, the article shows that Brandom’s own discourse with tradition is not, and cannot be, dialogical and, in accordance, that historical rationality is not, and cannot be, governed by the same social structure of inferentialism. The article concludes with the implications of such a claim on Brandom’s thesis as a whole and on the role of tradition in the process of normative change, in light of it.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Philosophy

Reference33 articles.

1. Baynes, Kenneth. “‘Gadamerian Platitudes’ and Rational Interpretations.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 33:1 (2007), 67–82.

2. Beaney, Michael. “Two Dogmas of Analytic Historiography.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28:3 (2020), 594–614.

3. Bennet, Jonathan. Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibnitz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. New York: Clarendon Press, 2001.

4. Brandom, Robert B. Making It Explicit. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.

5. Brandom, Robert B. Articulating Reasons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Does contemporary recognition theory rest on a mistake?;Philosophy & Social Criticism;2023-04-21

2. Forgiveness as an Approach to the History of Philosophy;Journal of Transcendental Philosophy;2022-01-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3