Performance of conventional and wiper CBN inserts under various cooling conditions in hard turning of AISI 52100 steel
Author:
Çetindağ Hüseyin Alp1, Çiçek Adem1, Uçak Necati1ORCID, Aslantas Kubilay2
Affiliation:
1. 226850 Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University , Ankara , Türkiye 2. 53002 Afyon Kocatepe University , Afyon , Türkiye
Abstract
Abstract
Cryogenic cooling and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) are regarded as effective green manufacturing techniques since they eliminate the excessive utilization of conventional cutting fluids (CCFs) that are known to have adverse impacts on both the environment and human health. Moreover, these methods have promising effects on surface integrity in machining hard-to-cut materials. This study investigates the impact of hybrid and cryogenic lubri-cooling methods on surface integrity (surface roughness, microhardness, and residual stresses) in hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel (62 HRC) with conventional and wiper CBN inserts. For that purpose, a precooling-based hybrid (a combination of precryogenic cooling of the workpiece and MQL) and direct cryogenic cooling techniques were used for comparison during the hard turning tests. The tests were carried out at a constant cutting speed (200 m/min), feed (0.1 mm∙rev−1), and depth of cut (0.1 mm) under dry, carbon dioxide (CO2), liquid nitrogen (LN2), CO2 + MQL, and LN2 + MQL conditions. The results show that hybrid lubri-cooling condition (CO2 + MQL) improved the surface quality and increased the compressive residual stresses at the machined surface when wiper inserts were employed. On the other hand, effective cooling under direct CO2 condition provided better surface integrity when machining with conventional inserts.
Funder
Ankara YÄldÄrÄm BeyazÄt Ãœniversitesi
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,General Materials Science
Reference36 articles.
1. A. D. Jayal, F. Badurdeen, O. W. Dillon, and I. S. Jawahir, “Sustainable manufacturing: modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels,” CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 144–152, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.03.006. 2. I. S. Jawahir, H. Attia, D. Biermann, et al.., “Cryogenic manufacturing processes,” CIRP Annals, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 713–736, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.007. 3. Chetan, S. Ghosh, and P. Venkateswara Rao, “Application of sustainable techniques in metal cutting for enhanced machinability: a review,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 100, pp. 17–34, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.039. 4. M. Dix, R. Wertheim, G. Schmidt, and C. Hochmuth, “Modeling of drilling assisted by cryogenic cooling for higher efficiency,” CIRP Annals, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 73–76, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2014.03.080. 5. M. Biček, F. Dumont, C. Courbon, F. Pušavec, J. Rech, and J. Kopač, “Cryogenic machining as an alternative turning process of normalized and hardened AISI 52100 bearing steel,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 212, no. 12, pp. 2609–2618, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.07.022.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|