Overtrusting robots: Setting a research agenda to mitigate overtrust in automation

Author:

Aroyo Alexander M.1ORCID,de Bruyne Jan2ORCID,Dheu Orian2ORCID,Fosch-Villaronga Eduard3ORCID,Gudkov Aleksei4ORCID,Hoch Holly5ORCID,Jones Steve6ORCID,Lutz Christoph7ORCID,Sætra Henrik8ORCID,Solberg Mads9,Tamò-Larrieux Aurelia5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. SIRRL, University of Waterloo , Waterloo , Canada

2. KU Leuven Centre for IT & IP Law (CiTiP) , KU Leuven, Leuven , Belgium

3. eLaw Center for Law and Digital Technologies, Leiden University , Leiden , The Netherlands

4. Faculty of Law: School for Theory of Law and Cross-sectoral Legal Disciplines, National Research University Higher School of Economics , Moscow , Russia

5. FAA-HSG, University of St. Gallen , St. Gallen , Switzerland

6. Department of Communication, University of Illinois Chicago , Chicago , United States

7. Nordic Centre for Internet and Society, BI Norwegian Business School , Nydalsveien 37 , 0484 Oslo , Norway

8. Department of Computer Science and Communication, Østfold University College , Østfold , Norway

9. Department of Health Sciences in Ålesund, Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim , Norway

Abstract

Abstract There is increasing attention given to the concept of trustworthiness for artificial intelligence and robotics. However, trust is highly context-dependent, varies among cultures, and requires reflection on others’ trustworthiness, appraising whether there is enough evidence to conclude that these agents deserve to be trusted. Moreover, little research exists on what happens when too much trust is placed in robots and autonomous systems. Conceptual clarity and a shared framework for approaching overtrust are missing. In this contribution, we offer an overview of pressing topics in the context of overtrust and robots and autonomous systems. Our review mobilizes insights solicited from in-depth conversations from a multidisciplinary workshop on the subject of trust in human–robot interaction (HRI), held at a leading robotics conference in 2020. A broad range of participants brought in their expertise, allowing the formulation of a forward-looking research agenda on overtrust and automation biases in robotics and autonomous systems. Key points include the need for multidisciplinary understandings that are situated in an eco-system perspective, the consideration of adjacent concepts such as deception and anthropomorphization, a connection to ongoing legal discussions through the topic of liability, and a socially embedded understanding of overtrust in education and literacy matters. The article integrates diverse literature and provides a ground for common understanding for overtrust in the context of HRI.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Artificial Intelligence,Cognitive Neuroscience,Developmental Neuroscience,Human-Computer Interaction

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3