Perceived injustice, perceived group threat and self-reported right-wing violence: An integrated approach

Author:

Williamson Harley1,De Buck Ann2,Pauwels Lieven JR2

Affiliation:

1. School of Criminology and Criminal Justice and Griffith Criminology Institute , Griffith University , 176 Messines Ridge Road , Mount Gravatt , , Australia

2. Faculty of Law and Criminology , Ghent University , Universiteitstraat 4 , , Ghent , Belgium

Abstract

Abstract The present study seeks to explain individual differences in self-reported politically motivated violence and vandalism, and participation within an extreme right-wing group. While violent extremism is highly debated, few criminological studies explicitly test factors that can trigger violent extremism. The present study addresses this gap by integrating two different frameworks: a perceived injustice and group threat-initiated model and an impulsivity-initiated model. We also investigate several intervening mechanisms. We draw on a sample of 705 adolescents and young adults living in Flanders, Belgium to test the strength of direct and intermediary effects of perceived injustice, perceptions of out-group threat from Jewish populations, ethnocentrism, feelings of superiority, moral support for right-wing extremism, and exposure to racist peers on politically motivated violence and vandalism. Results of structural equation models (SEM) indicate various direct and intermediary effects between both perceived injustice and violent extremism, and between impulsivity and violent extremism. Our model reveals the complex and intricate antecedents of violent extremism. Importantly, we find that feelings of injustice and unfair treatment are a major source of extremist violence, as they easily trigger often debated causes such as high in-group identification and ethnocentrism. Implications of these findings for preventing violent extremism are discussed, given the centrality of perceptions of injustice and threat.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law

Reference91 articles.

1. Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: an overview of general strain theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

2. Agnew, R. (2011). Chaper 6: Revitalizing Merton: General strain theory. In F. T. Cullen, C. Lero Jonson, A. J. Myer, & F. Adler (Eds.), The Origins of American Criminology (Vol. 16, pp. 137-158).

3. Akers, R. L. (1998). Social structure and social learning. Los Angeles: Roxbury.

4. Antonaccio, O., & Tittle, C. R. (2008). Morality, self‐control, and crime. Criminology, 46(2), 479-510.

5. Beelmann, A. (2020). A social-developmental model of radicalization: a systematic integration of existing theories and empirical research. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 14(1), 1-14.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3