Affiliation:
1. University College London , London , UK
Abstract
Abstract
Cognitive metaphor theory provides a systematic framework to better understand the working mechanism of metaphor. Its recent development further allows translation researchers to have a clearer insight into the movement of metaphor across languages and culture. Building on an empirical study, this paper examines the complementary relationship between two prominent cognitive metaphor theories – Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) and Conceptual Blending Theory (CBT), and discusses the practical contribution that this relationship could make to the existing research on metaphor translation. To construct a comparable basis for CMT and CBT, two parameters are adopted for data analysis, which is proven useful to serve the purpose. The two chosen parameters are: projection and provenance, denoting the content and the type of metaphor respectively. Metaphorical expressions analyzed in this paper are sourced from cosmology-themed articles published in Scientific American in 2017 and their Simplified Chinese translations published in Huanqiukexue. Findings show that delineated by the two parameters, CMT and CBT indeed share a complementary relationship owing to their different focuses and organizing mechanisms. Furthermore, the collaboration between CMT and CBT offers a well-rounded analytical framework for translation studies. In turn, the correlation between metaphor parameters and translation solutions provides detailed clues for studying metaphor across culture. Finally, the reflection of this dual-model parametric approach regarding its pros and cons is also shown to shed light on future research.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics
Reference45 articles.
1. Bort-Mir, Lorena, Marianna Bolognesi & Susan Ghaffaryan. 2020. Cross-cultural interpretation of filmic metaphors: A think-aloud experiment. Intercultural Pragmatics 17(4). 389–416, https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-4001.
2. Boyd, Richard. 1993. Metaphor and theory change: What is “metaphor” a metaphor for? In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 481–532. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Cameron, Lynne. 1999. Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data. In Lynne Cameron & Graham Low (eds.), Researching and applying metaphor, 105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Houndmills. Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Dancygier, Barbara. 2016. Figurativeness, conceptual metaphor, and blending. In Elena Semino & Zsófia Demjén (eds.), The routledge handbook of metaphor and language, 30–36. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献