Affiliation:
1. Hebrew University of Jerusalem Franz Rosenzweig Minerva Research Center Mt. Scopus Jerusalem Jerusalem Israel
Abstract
Abstract
In Marx’s posthumously published manuscripts from 1857–1863, we find a systematic exposition of his concept of subsumption. Though much has been written about it, significant interpretative gaps persist. In this article, I begin filling these gaps by examining the emergence of Marx’s concept of subsumption. I will argue that in the Grundrisse Marx brings together distinct but complementary elements from Hegel’s theories of judgment and teleology to coin two new and well delineated concepts of subsumption that prefigure his later concepts of formal and real subsumption. These two concepts may be defined as: (a) the process of acquiring the social relational property of being a means to an end; (b) the process by which changes in non-relational properties occur in something due to this acquisition – and occur to better suit said end.
Reference41 articles.
1. Allison, H. 1981. ‘Transcendental Schematism and The Problem of the Synthetic A Priori.’ Dialectica 35 (1/2), 57–83.
2. Althusser, L. and Balibar. É. 2009. Reading Capital. Trans. B. Brewster. London: Verso.
3. Arthur, C. J. 2009. ‘The Possessive Spirit of Capital: Subsumption/Inversion/Contradiction.’ In R. Bellofiore and R. Fineschi (eds.), Re-reading Marx: New Perspectives After the Critical Edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 148–162.
4. Babbage, C. 1835. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. London: Knight.
5. Bacon, R. 1986–1987, Summulae dialectices, Ed. A. de Libera. Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Age, 53: 139–289, 54: 171–278.